River Flow Modeling in Semi-Arid and Humid Regions Using an Integrated Method Based on LARS-WG and LSTM Models

被引:4
作者
Roushangar, Kiyoumars [1 ]
Abdelzad, Sadegh [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Water Resource Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tabriz, Fac Civil Engn, Water & Hydraul Struct, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Deep learning method; LARS-WG; Runoff; Semi-arid region; Temperature; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT; CLIMATE; UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY; EVAPORATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-023-03527-8
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
River flow or runoff is an important water flux that can pose great threats to water security because of changes in its timing, magnitude, and seasonality. In this study, runoff variations in two different climate conditions, including the semi-arid and humid climates, were assessed using an integrated method based on the LARS-WG and Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) models. Runoff variations were simulated for the base period of 2001-2020 and it was forecasted for the future period of 2021-2040. Climatic parameters were evaluated using the LARS-WG statistical model for the selected stations under the RCPs scenarios. Then, outputs obtained under the RCPs scenarios, including minimum temperature, maximum temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours, were considered as the input of the LSTM model. Results showed that the amount of mean runoff in spring for semi-arid areas and in spring and winter for humid areas will decrease in the next twenty years compared to the base period. For other seasons in both climates, the amount of runoff will increase. The maximum rainfall increase under the RCP8.5 scenario was 66.66 mm for the humid region and 30.06 mm for the semi-arid region compared to the base period. Also, the maximum temperature increase for the semi-arid region was 1.18 degrees C under the RCP8.5 scenario, and for the humid region was 1.07 degrees C under the RCP2.6 scenario. Results showed that the LSTM method can successfully model the future river flow values and river flow related to the previous day has a significant impact on the modeling process.
引用
收藏
页码:3813 / 3831
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] A Global Assessment of Runoff Sensitivity to Changes in Precipitation, Potential Evaporation, and Other Factors
    Berghuijs, Wouter R.
    Larsen, Joshua R.
    van Emmerik, Tim H. M.
    Woods, Ross A.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (10) : 8475 - 8486
  • [2] Use of artificial neural networks for prediction of discharge coefficient of triangular labyrinth side weir in curved channels
    Bilhan, Omer
    Emiroglu, M. Emin
    Kisi, Ozgur
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2011, 42 (04) : 208 - 214
  • [3] China's water resources vulnerability: A spatio-temporal analysis during 2003-2013
    Cai, Jialiang
    Varis, Li
    Yin, He
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 : 2901 - 2910
  • [4] Flood control management system for reservoirs
    Cheng, CT
    Chau, KW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (12) : 1141 - 1150
  • [5] Chung JY, 2015, PR MACH LEARN RES, V37, P2067
  • [6] Dumka Basant Ballabh, 2021, Indian Journal of Ecology, V48, P271
  • [7] Comparison of multi-gene genetic programming and dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system in modeling pan evaporation
    Eray, Okan
    Mert, Cihan
    Kisi, Ozgur
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 49 (04): : 1221 - 1233
  • [8] Survey of computational intelligence as basis to big flood management: challenges, research directions and future work
    Fotovatikhah, Farnaz
    Herrera, Manuel
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Chau, Kwok-Wing
    Ardabili, Sina Faizollahzadeh
    Piran, Md. Jalil
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 12 (01) : 411 - 437
  • [9] Ghasempour R., 2022, SOFT COMPUT, V4, P1
  • [10] EEMD and VMD based hybrid GPR models for river streamflow point and interval predictions
    Ghasempour, Roghayeh
    Azamathulla, Hazi Mohammad
    Roushangar, Kiyoumars
    [J]. WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (07) : 3960 - 3975