Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

被引:10
作者
Cairns, Ashley [1 ]
Chagpar, Anees B. [2 ]
Dupont, Elisabeth [3 ]
Levine, Edward A. [1 ]
Gass, Jennifer S. [4 ]
Chiba, Akiko [5 ]
Ollila, David W. [6 ]
Howard-McNatt, Marissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol Serv, Med Ctr BLVD, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Watson Clin, Lakeland, FL USA
[4] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Providence, RI USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
ONCOLOGY CONSENSUS GUIDELINE; CAVITY SHAVE MARGINS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; CANCER; IRRADIATION; TRIAL; LUMPECTOMY; ACCURACY; NOMOGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13884-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins. Patients and Methods. The SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins. Results. A total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29- 94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1-9.3 cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% ( 44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status. Conclusion. These data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.
引用
收藏
页码:6053 / 6058
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
American Society of Breast Surgeons, OFF STAT CONS GUID D
[2]   Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery [J].
Bae, Min Sun ;
Bernard-Davila, Blanca ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 117 :171-177
[3]   Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique [J].
Chagpar, AB ;
Martin, RCG ;
Hagendoorn, LJ ;
Chao, C ;
McMasters, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) :399-402
[4]   A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer [J].
Chagpar, Anees B. ;
Killelea, Brigid K. ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Butler, Meghan ;
Stavris, Karen ;
Li, Fangyong ;
Yao, Xiaopan ;
Bossuyt, Veerle ;
Harigopal, Malini ;
Lannin, Donald R. ;
Pusztai, Lajos ;
Horowitz, Nina R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (06) :503-510
[5]   Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Dupont, Elisabeth ;
Tsangaris, Theodore ;
Garcia-Cantu, Carlos ;
Howard-McNatt, Marissa ;
Chiba, Akiko ;
Berger, Adam C. ;
Levine, Edward A. ;
Gass, Jennifer S. ;
Gallagher, Kristalyn ;
Lum, Sharon S. ;
Martinez, Ricardo D. ;
Willis, Alliric, I ;
Pandya, Sonali, V ;
Brown, Eric A. ;
Fenton, Andrew ;
Mendiola, Amanda ;
Murray, Mary ;
Solomon, Naveenraj L. ;
Senthil, Maheswari ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Edmonson, David ;
Lazar, Melissa ;
Namm, Jukes P. ;
Li, Fangyong ;
Butler, Meghan ;
McGowan, Noreen E. ;
Herrera, Maria E. ;
Avitan, Yoana P. ;
Yoder, Brian ;
Walters, Laura L. ;
McPartland, Tara ;
Chagpar, Anees B. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (05) :876-881
[6]   Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[7]   Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery [J].
Grant, Y. ;
Al-Khudairi, R. ;
St John, E. ;
Barschkett, M. ;
Cunningham, D. ;
Al-Mufti, R. ;
Hogben, K. ;
Thiruchelvam, P. ;
Hadjiminas, D. J. ;
Darzi, A. ;
Carter, A. W. ;
Leff, D. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (04) :384-394
[8]   Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status [J].
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Hill, Deirdre A. ;
Wellman, Robert D. ;
Hubbard, Rebecca A. ;
Lee, Christoph I. ;
Wernli, Karen J. ;
Stout, Natasha K. ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
Henderson, Louise M. ;
Alford-Teaster, Jennifer A. ;
Onega, Tracy L. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (04) :611-617
[9]   Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Lord, Sarah J. ;
Warren, Ruth M. ;
Dixon, J. Michael ;
Irwig, Les .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (19) :3248-3258
[10]   Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ [J].
Howard-McNatt, Marissa ;
Dupont, Elisabeth ;
Tsangaris, Theodore ;
Garcia-Cantu, Carlos ;
Chiba, Akiko ;
Berger, Adam C. ;
Levine, Edward A. ;
Gass, Jennifer S. ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Chagpar, Anees B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 232 (04) :373-378