A review of how decision support tools address resource recovery in sanitation systems

被引:4
|
作者
Ddiba, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Andersson, Kim [2 ]
Dickin, Sarah [2 ]
Ekener, Elisabeth [1 ]
Finnveden, Goran [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Linnegatan 87D,Box 24218, S-10451 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol Environm Sustainabil, Belvaux, Luxembourg
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Dag Hammarskjoldsvag 14B, S-75237 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Circular economy; Resource recovery; Decision support tools; Biowaste; Sanitation systems; Sanitation economy; WASTE-WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118365
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, there is increasing interest in recovering resources from sanitation systems. However, the process of planning and implementing circular sanitation is complex and can necessitate software-based tools to support decision-making. In this paper, we review 24 decision support software tools used for sanitation planning, to generate insights into how they address resource recovery across the sanitation chain. The findings reveal that the tools can address many planning issues around resource recovery in sanitation including analysis of material flows, integrating resource recovery technologies and products in the design of sanitation systems, and assessing the sustainability implications of resource recovery. The results and recommendations presented here can guide users in the choice of different tools depending on, for example, what kind of tool features and functions the user is interested in as well as the elements of the planning process and the sanitation service chain that are in focus. However, some issues are not adequately covered and need improvements in the available tools including quantifying the demand for and value of resource recovery products, addressing retrofitting of existing sanitation infrastructure for resource recovery and assessing social impacts of resource recovery from a life cycle perspective. While there is scope to develop new tools or to modify existing ones to cover these gaps, communication efforts are needed to create awareness about existing tools, their functions and how they address resource recovery. It is also important to further integrate the available tools into infrastructure planning and programming processes by e.g. customizing to relevant planning regimes and procedures, to move them beyond research and pilots into practice, and hopefully contribute towards more circular sanitation systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options
    Huysegoms, Lies
    Cappuyns, Valerie
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 196 : 278 - 296
  • [32] How do current sustainability assessment tools support farmers' strategic decision making?
    Coteur, Ine
    Wustenberghs, Hilde
    Debruyne, Lies
    Lauwers, Ludwig
    Marchand, Fleur
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 114
  • [33] Sustainable energy, water and food nexus systems: A focused review of decision-making tools for efficient resource management and governance
    Namany, Sarah
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    Govindan, Rajesh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 225 : 610 - 626
  • [34] Evaluation of decision support tools for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of literature
    Tapp, Diane
    Blais, Marie-Claude
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (03) : 356 - 364
  • [35] A review on generation, characterization, containment, transport and treatment of fecal sludge and septage with resource recovery-oriented sanitation
    Shukla, Amol
    Patwa, Aakash
    Parde, Divyesh
    Vijay, Ritesh
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 216
  • [36] Promoting sustainable intensification in precision agriculture: review of decision support systems development and strategies
    Lindblom, Jessica
    Lundstrom, Christina
    Ljung, Magnus
    Jonsson, Anders
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2017, 18 (03) : 309 - 331
  • [37] A Comprehensive Review on Smart Decision Support Systems for Health Care
    Moreira, Mario W. L.
    Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C.
    Korotaev, Valery
    Al-Muhtadi, Jalal
    Kumar, Neeraj
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (03): : 3536 - 3545
  • [38] Spatial Decision Support Systems with Automated Machine Learning: A Review
    Wen, Richard
    Li, Songnian
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [39] A review of visualisations in agricultural decision support systems: An HCI perspective
    Gutierrez, Francisco
    Htun, Nyi Nyi
    Schlenz, Florian
    Kasimati, Aikaterini
    Verbert, Katrien
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 163
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Decision-making Theories used in Decision Support Systems Research
    Mombini, Haadi
    Tulu, Bengisu
    AMCIS 2020 PROCEEDINGS, 2020,