A review of how decision support tools address resource recovery in sanitation systems

被引:4
|
作者
Ddiba, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Andersson, Kim [2 ]
Dickin, Sarah [2 ]
Ekener, Elisabeth [1 ]
Finnveden, Goran [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Linnegatan 87D,Box 24218, S-10451 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol Environm Sustainabil, Belvaux, Luxembourg
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Dag Hammarskjoldsvag 14B, S-75237 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Circular economy; Resource recovery; Decision support tools; Biowaste; Sanitation systems; Sanitation economy; WASTE-WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118365
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, there is increasing interest in recovering resources from sanitation systems. However, the process of planning and implementing circular sanitation is complex and can necessitate software-based tools to support decision-making. In this paper, we review 24 decision support software tools used for sanitation planning, to generate insights into how they address resource recovery across the sanitation chain. The findings reveal that the tools can address many planning issues around resource recovery in sanitation including analysis of material flows, integrating resource recovery technologies and products in the design of sanitation systems, and assessing the sustainability implications of resource recovery. The results and recommendations presented here can guide users in the choice of different tools depending on, for example, what kind of tool features and functions the user is interested in as well as the elements of the planning process and the sanitation service chain that are in focus. However, some issues are not adequately covered and need improvements in the available tools including quantifying the demand for and value of resource recovery products, addressing retrofitting of existing sanitation infrastructure for resource recovery and assessing social impacts of resource recovery from a life cycle perspective. While there is scope to develop new tools or to modify existing ones to cover these gaps, communication efforts are needed to create awareness about existing tools, their functions and how they address resource recovery. It is also important to further integrate the available tools into infrastructure planning and programming processes by e.g. customizing to relevant planning regimes and procedures, to move them beyond research and pilots into practice, and hopefully contribute towards more circular sanitation systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Waste Management Decision Support Tools and Their Ability to Assess Circular Biowaste Management Systems
    Vea, Eldbjorg Blikra
    Martinez-Sanchez, Veronica
    Thomsen, Marianne
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [2] Decision support systems for sustainable logistics: a review and bibliometric analysis
    Qaiser, Fahham Hasan
    Ahmed, Karim
    Sykora, Martin
    Choudhary, Alok
    Simpson, Mike
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2017, 117 (07) : 1376 - 1388
  • [3] Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Siren, Elina
    Brunner, Sibyl Hanna
    Weibel, Bettina
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 306 - 315
  • [4] Decision support tools, systems and indices for sustainable coastal planning and management: A review
    Barzehkar, Mojtaba
    Parnell, Kevin E.
    Soomere, Tarmo
    Dragovich, Deirdre
    Engstrom, Johanna
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 212 (212)
  • [5] Decision support tools of sustainability assessment for urban stormwater management - A review of their roles in governance and management
    Sun, Zhengdong
    Sjoman, Johanna Deak
    Blecken, Godecke-Tobias
    Randrup, Thomas B.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 447
  • [6] Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship
    Yusuf, Havan
    Hillman, Alison
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Cameron, Angus
    Badger, Skye
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [7] DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
    Lohman, Hannah A. C.
    Morgan, Victoria L.
    Li, Yalin
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Rowles, Lewis S.
    Cook, Sherri M.
    Guest, Jeremy S.
    ACS ENVIRONMENTAL AU, 2023, 3 (03): : 179 - 192
  • [8] A decision -support framework for techno-economic-sustainability assessment of resource recovery alternatives
    Silk, Dominic
    Mazzali, Beatrice
    Gargalo, Carina L.
    Pinelo, Manuel
    Udugama, Isuru A.
    Mansouri, Seyed Soheil
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 266
  • [9] Tools for Sustainable Change: How Spatial Decision-Support Tools Support Transformative Urban Regeneration
    Dionisio, Rita De Jesus
    Schindler, Mirjam
    Kingham, Simon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-PLANNING RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (02) : 21 - 42
  • [10] Enhancing Carbon Sequestration: A Systematic Literature Review of Spatial Decision Support Tools
    Tarasova, Ekaterina
    Valentini, Riccardo
    Di Lallo, Giulio
    Cotrina-Sanchez, Alexander
    Chiriaco, Maria Vincenza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (12)