Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients for predicting lymphovascular space invasion in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer

被引:2
作者
Cheng, Jin-mei [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Wei-xiao [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Bang-guo [3 ]
Pan, Jian [4 ]
Zhou, Hai-ying [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tian-wu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Sichuan Key Lab Med Imaging, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp, 2, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Panzhihua, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Taiping Town Cent Hlth Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Leshan, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
cervical cancer; lymphovascular space invasion; histogram analysis; magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; SEMIQUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; UTILITY; MAPS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1206659
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo investigate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis based on whole tumor volume for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. MethodsFifty consecutive patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were stratified into LVSI-positive (n = 24) and LVSI-negative (n = 26) groups according to the postoperative pathology. All patients underwent pelvic 3.0T diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm(2) preoperatively. Whole-tumor ADC histogram analysis was performed. Differences in the clinical characteristics, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, and ADC histogram parameters between the two groups were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC histogram parameters in predicting LVSI. ResultsADC(max), ADC(range), ADC(90), ADC(95), and ADC(99) were significantly lower in the LVSI-positive group than in the LVSI-negative group (all P-values < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were reported for the remaining ADC parameters, clinical characteristics, and conventional MRI features between the groups (all P-values > 0.05). For predicting LVSI in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer, a cutoff ADC(max) of 1.75x10(-3) mm(2)/s achieved the largest area under ROC curve (A(z)) of 0.750, followed by a cutoff ADC(range) of 1.36x10(-3) mm(2)/s and ADC(99) of 1.75x10(-3) mm(2)/s (A(z) = 0.748 and 0.729, respectively), and the cutoff ADC(90) and ADC(95) achieved an A(z) of ConclusionWhole-tumor ADC histogram analysis has potential value for preoperative prediction of LVSI in patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. ADC(max), ADC(range,) and ADC(99) are promising prediction parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Berek, Jonathan S. ;
Cuello Fredes, Mauricio ;
Denny, Lynette A. ;
Grenman, Seija ;
Karunaratne, Kanishka ;
Kehoe, Sean T. ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Olawaiye, Alexander B. ;
Prat, Jaime ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 145 (01) :129-135
[2]   The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical cancer [J].
Chen Jianyu ;
Zhang Yun ;
Liang Biling ;
Yang Zehong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 74 (03) :E102-E107
[3]   Relationship Between Imaging Biomarkers of Stage I Cervical Cancer and Poor-Prognosis Histologic Features: Quantitative Histogram Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted MR Images [J].
Downey, Kate ;
Riches, Sophie F. ;
Morgan, Veronica A. ;
Giles, Sharon L. ;
Attygalle, Ayoma D. ;
Ind, Tom E. ;
Barton, Desmond P. J. ;
Shepherd, John H. ;
deSouza, Nandita M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) :314-320
[4]   Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for the Assessment of Cervical Cancer [J].
Guan, Yue ;
Shi, Hua ;
Chen, Ying ;
Liu, Song ;
Li, Weifeng ;
Jiang, Zhuoran ;
Wang, Huanhuan ;
He, Jian ;
Zhou, Zhengyang ;
Ge, Yun .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (02) :212-217
[5]   Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019 [J].
Koh, Wui-Jin ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. ;
Bean, Sarah ;
Bradley, Kristin ;
Campos, Susana M. ;
Cho, Kathleen R. ;
Chon, Hye Sook ;
Chu, Christina ;
Clark, Rachel ;
Cohn, David ;
Crispens, Marta Ann ;
Damast, Shari ;
Dorigo, Oliver ;
Eifel, Patricia J. ;
Fisher, Christine M. ;
Frederick, Peter ;
Gaffney, David K. ;
Han, Ernest ;
Huh, Warner K. ;
Lurain, John R., III ;
Mariani, Andrea ;
Mutch, David ;
Nagel, Christa ;
Nekhlyudov, Larissa ;
Fader, Amanda Nickles ;
Remmenga, Steven W. ;
Reynolds, R. Kevin ;
Tillmanns, Todd ;
Ueda, Stefanie ;
Wyse, Emily ;
Yashar, Catheryn M. ;
McMillian, Nicole R. ;
Scavone, Jillian L. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (01) :64-84
[6]   Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cervical cancer [J].
Lee, Jiyeong ;
Kim, Chan Kyo ;
Park, Sung Yoon .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (02) :283-292
[7]   Incremental Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J].
Li, Xiaoxia ;
Yuan, Ying ;
Ren, Jiliang ;
Shi, Yiqian ;
Tao, Xiaofeng .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (11) :1433-1438
[8]   Correlation of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Uterine Cervical Pathologic Finding [J].
Lin, Yuning ;
Li, Hui ;
Chen, Ziqian ;
Ni, Ping ;
Zhong, Qun ;
Huang, Huijuan ;
Sandrasegaran, Kumar .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (05) :1125-1131
[9]   Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer [J].
Makino, Hiroshi ;
Kato, Hiroki ;
Furui, Tatsuro ;
Morishige, Ken-ichirou ;
Kanematsu, Masayuki .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (04) :1098-1104
[10]   Clinical significance of lympho vascular space involvement and lymph node micrometastases in early-stage cervical cancer:: A retrospective case-control surgico-pathological study [J].
Marchiolé, P ;
Buénerd, A ;
Benchaib, M ;
Nezhat, K ;
Dargent, D ;
Mathevet, P .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (03) :727-732