Understanding the Interaction of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Visual Feedback During an Ankle Movement Task

被引:1
作者
Cummings, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Doshi, Aditi [1 ,3 ]
Madhavan, Sangeetha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Appl Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Brain Plast Lab, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Appl Hlth Sci, Grad Program Rehabil Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Appl Hlth Sci, Grad Program Neurosci, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
tDCS; neuroplasticity; priming; gait; PRIMARY MOTOR; REACTION-TIME; TDCS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; MODULATION; IMPLICIT; HUMANS; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1123/mc.2022-0105
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to facilitate motor performance in healthy individuals; however, results are variable. The neuromodulatory effects of tDCS during visuomotor tasks may be influenced by extrinsic visual feedback. However, this interaction between tDCS and visual feedback has not been explored for the lower limb. Hence, our objective was to explore if tDCS over the primary lower limb motor cortex differentially facilitates motor performance based on the availability of visual feedback.Methods: Twenty-two neurotypical adults performed ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion movements while tracking a sinusoidal target. Spatiotemporal, spatial, and temporal error were calculated between the ankle position and target. Participants attended two sessions, a week apart, with (Stim) and without (No-Stim) anodal tDCS. Sessions were divided into two blocks containing randomized visual feedback conditions: full, no, and blindfold. During Stim sessions, the first block included the application of tDCS to the lower limb M1.Results: Spatiotemporal and spatial error increased as feedback faded (p <.001). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant interaction between tDCS and visual feedback (p < .05) on spatiotemporal error. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant improvement in spatiotemporal error when visual feedback was absent (p <.01). Spatial and temporal errors were not significantly affected by stimulation or visual feedback.Discussion: Our results suggest that feedback is not available. These findings indicate that visual feedback may play an important role in demonstrating the effectiveness of tDCS.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 764
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] The Homeostatic Interaction Between Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Learning in Humans is Related to GABAA Activity
    Amadi, Ugwechi
    Allman, Claire
    Johansen-Berg, Heidi
    Stagg, Charlotte J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (05) : 898 - 905
  • [2] Brain stimulation and physical performance
    Angius, Luca
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Santarnecchi, Emiliano
    [J]. SPORT AND THE BRAIN: THE SCIENCE OF PREPARING, ENDURING AND WINNING, PT C, 2018, 240 : 317 - 339
  • [3] Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines
    Antal, A.
    Alekseichuk, I.
    Bikson, M.
    Brockmoeller, J.
    Brunoni, A. R.
    Chen, R.
    Cohen, L. G.
    Dowthwaite, G.
    Ellrich, J.
    Floeel, A.
    Fregni, F.
    George, M. S.
    Hamilton, R.
    Haueisen, J.
    Herrmann, C. S.
    Hummel, F. C.
    Lefaucheur, J. P.
    Liebetanz, D.
    Loo, C. K.
    McCaig, C. D.
    Miniussi, C.
    Miranda, P. C.
    Moliadze, V.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    Nowak, R.
    Padberg, F.
    Pascual-Leone, A.
    Poppendieck, W.
    Priori, A.
    Rossi, S.
    Rossini, P. M.
    Rothwell, J.
    Rueger, M. A.
    Ruffini, G.
    Schellhorn, K.
    Siebner, H. R.
    Ugawa, Y.
    Wexler, A.
    Ziemann, U.
    Hallett, M.
    Paulus, W.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (09) : 1774 - 1809
  • [4] Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans
    Antal, A
    Nitsche, MA
    Kincses, TZ
    Kruse, W
    Hoffmann, KP
    Paulus, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 19 (10) : 2888 - 2892
  • [5] Atkinson J., 2008, CHILD NEUROPSYCHOL, P183
  • [6] Cerebellar stroke impairs temporal but not spatial accuracy during implicit motor learning
    Boyd, LA
    Winstein, CJ
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2004, 18 (03) : 134 - 143
  • [7] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the supplementary motor area delays spontaneous antiphase-to-in-phase transitions
    Carter, Michael J.
    Maslovat, Dana
    Carlsen, Anthony N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 113 (03) : 780 - 785
  • [8] The Binding of Learning to Action in Motor Adaptation
    Castro, Luis Nicolas Gonzalez
    Monsen, Craig Bryant
    Smith, Maurice A.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (06)
  • [9] Ipsilateral Motor Pathways and Transcallosal Inhibition During Lower Limb Movement After Stroke
    Cleland, Brice T.
    Madhavan, Sangeetha
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2021, 35 (04) : 367 - 378
  • [10] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA