Co-design for staff professional learning within universities: a case study

被引:1
作者
Kelly, Nick [1 ]
Brophy, Claire [1 ]
Scharoun, Lisa [1 ]
Finger, Melanie [1 ]
Meth, Deanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Co-design; Professional learning; Higher education; Academic; Workshops; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1108/JARHE-12-2022-0381
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The paper discusses the use of co-design for staff professional learning within higher education. It suggests that three distinct approaches to professional learning can be characterised as help-yourself platforms/services, drive-by workshops and co-design workshops. It makes pragmatic suggestions for where co-design might be used and heuristics for its successful use, based upon the authors' collective experiences.Design/methodology/approach- This practitioner paper presents a case-study of co-design in a university context. Staff from across disciplinary boundaries were brought together to co-design novel learning experiences for students for a non-traditional context.Findings - Findings from a case study are used to highlight the strengths of a co-design approach, as understood through the lenses of networked learning and self-determination theory. It juxtaposes co-design for staff learning with other approaches and finds it to be valuable and underutilised.Research limitations/implications - The research discusses a single case study involving two workshops with a sample size of 112 participants. It is included as an example of co-design for professional learning in higher education.Originality/value - Co-design for professional learning in higher education is poorly understood and presently underutilised. This paper addresses this gap by presenting an example of co-design for professional learning in higher education and theorising its significance.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 327
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   The professional learning of teachers in higher education [J].
Knight, P ;
Tait, J ;
Yorke, M .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (03) :319-339
[22]  
Lingard B., 2017, Oxford research encyclopedia of education, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190264093.013.74
[23]  
Manzini E, 2015, DES THINK DES THEOR, P1
[24]  
Meth D., 2020, EVIDENCE BASED FACUL, P347, DOI [10.4018/978-1-7998-2212-7, DOI 10.4018/978-1-7998-2212-7]
[25]   Are you really doing 'codesign'? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations [J].
Moll, Sandra ;
Wyndham-West, Michelle ;
Mulvale, Gillian ;
Park, Sean ;
Buettgen, Alexis ;
Phoenix, Michelle ;
Fleisig, Robert ;
Bruce, Emma .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11)
[26]   Design facilitation: A critical review of conceptualisations and constructs [J].
Mosely, Genevieve ;
Markauskaite, Lina ;
Wrigley, Cara .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 42
[27]  
Newman JohnHenry., 1996, The Idea of the University
[28]  
Nicholls G., 2014, Professional development in higher education: New dimensions and directions
[29]   Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom Applying self-determination theory to educational practice [J].
Niemiec, Christopher P. ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 2009, 7 (02) :133-144
[30]  
Northcote M., 2013, PRESENTED ASCILITE A, P642