Evaluation and Suppression Method of Turn-Off Current Spike for SiC/Si Hybrid Switch

被引:3
作者
Qin, Haihong [1 ]
Xie, Sixuan [1 ]
Ba, Zhenhua [1 ]
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Chen, Wenming [1 ]
Fu, Dafeng [1 ]
Xun, Qian [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Elect Engn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, S-41279 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Switches; Insulated gate bipolar transistors; Silicon; Silicon carbide; MOSFET; Logic gates; Delays; SiC MOSFET; Si IGBT; hybrid switch; current spike; suppression method; SI-IGBT; MOSFET; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3251397
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
SiC MOSFET/Si IGBT (SiC/Si) hybrid switch usually selects the gate control pattern that SiC MOSFET turns on earlier and turns off later than Si IGBT, with the aim of making the hybrid switch show excellent switching characteristics of SiC MOSFET and reduce switching loss. However, when SiC MOSFET turns off, the fast slew rate of drain source voltage causes the current spike in Si IGBT due to the effects of parasitic capacitance charging and carrier recombination, which will produce additional turn-off loss, thus affecting the overall efficiency and temperature rise of the converter. Based on the double pulse test circuit of SiC/Si hybrid switch, the mathematical model of the turn-off transient process is established. The effects of the remnant carrier recombination degree of Si IGBT, the turn-off speed of SiC MOSFET and the working conditions on the turn-off current spike of hybrid switch are evaluated. Although adjusting these parameters can reduce the turn-off current spike somewhat, additional losses will be introduced. Therefore, a new method to suppress the turn-off current spike is proposed to balance the power loss and current stress.
引用
收藏
页码:26832 / 26842
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Cui YT, 2012, PROC IEEE INT SYMP, P228, DOI 10.1109/ISIE.2012.6237089
  • [2] Practical Design Considerations for a Si IGBT plus SiC MOSFET Hybrid Switch: Parasitic Interconnect Influences, Cost, and Current Ratio Optimization
    Deshpande, Amol
    Luo, Fang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 34 (01) : 724 - 737
  • [3] Deshpande A, 2015, WIPDA 2015 3RD IEEE WORKSHOP ON WIDE BANDGAP POWER DEVICES AND APPLICATIONS, P296, DOI 10.1109/WiPDA.2015.7369319
  • [4] He Z., 2018, P OPT FIB COMM C EXP, P1, DOI DOI 10.1364/OFC.2018.TH2A.59
  • [5] He ZZ, 2019, IEEE ENER CONV, P4558, DOI [10.1109/ecce.2019.8912803, 10.1109/ECCE.2019.8912803]
  • [6] Huang AQ, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INTEGRATED POWER PACKAGING (IWIPP), P64, DOI 10.1109/IWIPP.2015.7295979
  • [7] JIANG YQ, 1992, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, P77
  • [8] Performance Evaluation of High-Power SiC MOSFET Modules in Comparison to Si IGBT Modules
    Zhang, Lei
    Yuan, Xibo
    Wu, Xiaojie
    Shi, Congcong
    Zhang, Jiahang
    Zhang, Yonglei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 34 (02) : 1181 - 1196
  • [9] A novel gate driver for Si/SiC hybrid switch for multi-objective optimization
    Li, Zongjian
    Dai, Xiaoping
    Jiang, Xi
    Qi, Fang
    Liu, Yang
    Ke, Pan
    Wang, Yongzhi
    Wang, Jun
    [J]. IET POWER ELECTRONICS, 2021, 14 (02) : 422 - 431
  • [10] Power Loss Model and Device Sizing Optimization of Si/SiC Hybrid Switches
    Li, Zongjian
    Wang, Jun
    Ji, Bing
    Shen, Z. John
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 35 (08) : 8512 - 8523