Have environmental regulations restrained FDI in China? New evidence from a panel threshold model

被引:2
|
作者
Guo, Tingbo [1 ]
Zheng, Bowen [2 ]
Kamal, Muhammad Abdul [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Math Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Henan Univ, Acad Hinterland Dev, Kaifeng 475000, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Abdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Econ, Mardan, Khyber Pukhtunk, Pakistan
关键词
Environmental regulations; FDI; Panel threshold model; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DYNAMIC PANELS; CO2; EMISSION; MULTINATIONALS; INFLOWS; SECTORS; CHOICE; GROWTH; TRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24841-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental regulations on inward foreign direct investment in China. For this purpose, a panel threshold model was constructed to assess the threshold effects of environmental regulations on the influx of foreign direct investments (FDI) . The findings indicate that, under the influence of human capital, the impact of environmental regulations on FDI in China was characterized by a V-shaped curve, indicating an initial inhibitory effect followed by a subsequent increase. A plausible explanation is that specific pollution-generating FDI must withdraw from China because of stringent environmental regulations before human capital reaches a certain threshold level. Meanwhile, impaired by the adverse selection effect, some cleaner-production FDI cannot easily enter China. As a result, environmental regulations in this stage have an inhibitory effect on FDI in China. However, part of the pollution-generating FDI is converted into cleaner production after the human capital level reaches the threshold limit. Further, due to the positive selection effect, additional cleaner-production FDI can also enter China from different destinations. At this stage, environmental regulations boost overall FDI entering China.
引用
收藏
页码:39733 / 39749
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis
    Demena, Binyam Afewerk
    Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 138
  • [32] The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on carbon neutrality in China: New evidence based on the spatial measurement model
    Yang, Yuanhua
    Peng, Zhongwen
    Tang, Dengli
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 35 (03) : 1456 - 1478
  • [33] FDI and Industrial Productivity in China: Evidence from Panel Data in 2001-06
    Zhao, Zhongxiu
    Zhang, Kevin Honglin
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 14 (03) : 656 - 665
  • [34] Dynamic Impact of Environmental Regulation on Environmental Performance in China: New Evidence from a Semiparametric Additive Panel Analysis
    Li, Xinjin
    Long, Ruyin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [35] The Role of Institution on FDI and Environmental Pollution Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries
    Thanh Cong Ha
    Hoang Nam Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (06): : 609 - 620
  • [36] Effect of FDI on China's environmental pollution: Evidence based on spatial panel data
    ZHENG Yue-ming
    Ecological Economy, 2018, (02) : 141 - 146
  • [37] Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data
    Hao, Yu
    Deng, Yuxin
    Lu, Zhi-Nan
    Chen, Hao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 966 - 976
  • [38] US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US-Based Multinational Firms
    Hanna, Rema
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (03) : 158 - 189
  • [39] The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression
    Zhu, Huiming
    Duan, Lijun
    Guo, Yawei
    Yu, Keming
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 58 : 237 - 248
  • [40] Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China
    Dean, Judith M.
    Lovely, Mary E.
    Wang, Hua
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (01) : 1 - 13