Complication rates following stand-alone lateral interbody fusion: a single institution series after 10 years of experience

被引:1
|
作者
Godolias, Periklis [1 ]
Tataryn, Zachary L. [2 ]
Frieler, Sven [3 ]
Nunna, Ravi [2 ]
Charlot, Kaarina [2 ]
Tran, Angela [2 ]
Pluemer, Jonathan [3 ]
Cibura, Charlotte [3 ]
Al-Awadi, Hamzah [2 ]
Daher, Zeyad [2 ]
Dudda, Marcel [4 ]
Schildhauer, Thomas A. [3 ]
Chapman, Jens [2 ]
Oskouian, Rod [2 ]
机构
[1] St Josef Hosp Essen Werden, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Propsteistr 2, D-45239 Essen, Germany
[2] Seattle Sci Fdn, 550 17th Ave,Suite 600, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, BG Univ Hosp Bergmannsheil, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Burkle de la Camp Pl 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconstruct Surg, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; XLIF; LLIF; OLIF; LUMBAR SPINE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-022-03408-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This retrospective single institution study's goal was to analyze and report the complications from stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF). Methods This research was approved by the institutional review board (STUDY2021000113). We retrospectively reviewed the database of patients with adult degenerative spine deformity treated via LLIF at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. Results Stand-alone LLIF was performed in 158 patients (145 XLIF, 13 OLIF; mean age 65 y.; 88 f., 70 m.). Mean surgical time was 85 min (+/- 24 min). Mean follow-up was 14 months (+/- 5 m). Surgical blood loss averaged 120 mL (+/- 187 mL) and the mean number of fused levels was 1.2 (+/- 0.4 levels). Overall complication rate was 19.6% (31 total; 23 approach-related, 8 secondary complications). Conclusion Lateral interbody fusion appears to be a safe surgical intervention with relatively low complication- and revision rates.
引用
收藏
页码:2121 / 2127
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Complication rates following stand-alone lateral interbody fusion: a single institution series after 10 years of experience
    Periklis Godolias
    Zachary L. Tataryn
    Sven Frieler
    Ravi Nunna
    Kaarina Charlot
    Angela Tran
    Jonathan Plümer
    Charlotte Cibura
    Hamzah Al-Awadi
    Zeyad Daher
    Marcel Dudda
    Thomas A. Schildhauer
    Jens Chapman
    Rod Oskouian
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2023, 33 : 2121 - 2127
  • [2] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [3] Rate of Revision Surgery After Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nemani, Venu M.
    Aichmair, Alexander
    Taher, Fadi
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (05) : E326 - E331
  • [4] Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    McDowell, Michael M.
    Panczykowski, David M.
    Gandhoke, Gurpreet S.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [5] The effect of sarcopenia in the clinical outcomes following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Ma, Yaojing
    Li, Fangcai
    Xu, Zhengkuan
    Chen, Qixin
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (03) : 469 - 476
  • [6] Long-Term Durability of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Agarwal, Nitin
    White, Michael D.
    Roy, Souvik
    Ozpinar, Alp
    Alan, Nima
    Lavadi, Raj Swaroop
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Kanter, Adam S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [7] Incidence and impact of implant subsidence after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Bocahut, N.
    Audureau, E.
    Poignard, A.
    Delambre, J.
    Queinnecc, S.
    Lachaniette, C. -H. Flouzat
    Allain, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [8] Fusion rate for stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Manzur, Mustfa K.
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (11) : 1816 - 1825
  • [9] Incidence of adjacent-segment surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nayar, Gautam
    Roy, Souvik
    Lutfi, Waseem
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Alan, Nima
    Ozpinar, Alp
    Hamilton, Kojo
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [10] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)