Brain structure and phenotypic profile of superagers compared with age-matched older adults: a longitudinal analysis from the Vallecas Project

被引:33
作者
Garo-Pascual, Marta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gaser, Christian [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Linda [2 ]
Tohka, Jussi [7 ]
Medina, Miguel [2 ,8 ]
Strange, Bryan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, IdISSC, Ctr Biomed Technol, Lab Clin Neurosci, Madrid 28223, Spain
[2] Queen Sofia Fdn Alzheimer Ctr, CIEN Fdn, Alzheimer Dis Res Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Madrid, Inst Cajal, PhD Program Neurosci, Madrid, Spain
[4] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Struct Brain Mapping Grp, Jena, Germany
[5] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Jena, Germany
[6] German Ctr Mental Hlth, Jena, Germany
[7] Univ Eastern Finland, AI Virtanen Inst Mol Sci, Kuopio, Finland
[8] Network Ctr Biomed Res Neurodegenerat Dis, Madrid, Spain
来源
LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY | 2023年 / 4卷 / 08期
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SUPERIOR MEMORY; YOUTHFUL MEMORY; LIFE; DEMENTIA; RISK; PERFORMANCE; DEPRESSION; SYMPTOMS; NETWORKS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00079-X
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Cognitive abilities, particularly memory, normally decline with age. However, some individuals, often designated as superagers, can reach late life with the memory function of individuals 30 years younger. We aimed to characterise the brain structure of superagers and identify demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors associated with this phenotype. Methods We selected cognitively healthy participants from the Vallecas Project longitudinal cohort recruited between Oct 10, 2011, and Jan 14, 2014, aged 79.5 years or older, on the basis of their delayed verbal episodic memory score. Participants were assessed with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test and with three non-memory tests (the 15-item version of the Boston Naming Test, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and the Animal Fluency Test). Participants were classified as superagers if they scored at or above the mean values for a 50-56-year-old in the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test and within one standard deviation of the mean or above for their age and education level in the three non-memory tests, or as typical older adults if they scored within one standard deviation of the mean for their age and education level in the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test. Data acquired as per protocol from up to six yearly follow-ups were used for longitudinal analyses. Findings We included 64 superagers (mean age 81.9 years; 38 [59%] women and 26 [41%] men) and 55 typical older adults (82.4 years; 35 [64%] women and 20 [36%] men). The median number of follow-up visits was 5.0 (IQR 5.0-6.0) for superagers and 5.0 (4.5-6.0) for typical older adults. Superagers exhibited higher grey matter volume cross-sectionally in the medial temporal lobe, cholinergic forebrain, and motor thalamus. Longitudinally, superagers also showed slower total grey matter atrophy, particularly within the medial temporal lobe, than did typical older adults. A machine learning classification including 89 demographic, lifestyle, and clinical predictors showed that faster movement speed (despite no group differences in exercise frequency) and better mental health were the most differentiating factors for superagers. Similar concentrations of dementia blood biomarkers in superager and typical older adult groups suggest that group differences reflect inherent superager resistance to typical age-related memory loss. Interpretation Factors associated with dementia prevention are also relevant for resistance to age-related memory decline and brain atrophy, and the association between superageing and movement speed could provide potential novel insights into how to preserve memory function into the ninth decade. Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:E374 / E385
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Hippocampal-anterior thalamic pathways for memory: uncovering a network of direct and indirect actions [J].
Aggleton, John P. ;
O'Mara, Shane M. ;
Vann, Seralynne D. ;
Wright, Nick F. ;
Tsanov, Marian ;
Erichsen, Jonathan T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 31 (12) :2292-2307
[2]   Resistance vs resilience to Alzheimer disease Clarifying terminology for preclinical studies [J].
Arenaza-Urquijo, Eider M. ;
Vemuri, Prashanthi .
NEUROLOGY, 2018, 90 (15) :695-703
[3]   Unified segmentation [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :839-851
[4]   A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm [J].
Ashburner, John .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 38 (01) :95-113
[5]   Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan [J].
Betzel, Richard F. ;
Byrge, Lisa ;
He, Ye ;
Goni, Joaquin ;
Zuo, Xi-Nian ;
Sporns, Olaf .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 102 :345-357
[6]   Motor thalamus integration of cortical, cerebellar and basal ganglia information: implications for normal and parkinsonian conditions [J].
Bosch-Bouju, Clementine ;
Hyland, Brian I. ;
Parr-Brownlie, Louise C. .
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[7]  
Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI [10.1186/s12859-018-2419-4, 10.3322/caac.21834]
[8]   Successful aging: The contribution of early-life and midlife risk factors [J].
Britton, Annie ;
Shipley, Martin ;
Singh-Manoux, Archana ;
Marmot, Michael G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (06) :1098-1105
[9]   The Trajectory of Gait Speed Preceding Mild Cognitive Impairment [J].
Buracchio, Teresa ;
Dodge, Hiroko H. ;
Howieson, Diane ;
Wasserman, Dara ;
Kaye, Jeffrey .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 67 (08) :980-986
[10]   CUED-RECALL IN AMNESIA [J].
BUSCHKE, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 6 (04) :433-440