Impact of Starting Model on Waveform Inversion in Ultrasound Tomography

被引:8
作者
Ali, Rehman [1 ]
Mitcham, Trevor [1 ]
Duric, Nebojsa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Imaging Sci, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2023 | 2023年 / 12470卷
关键词
Nonlinear inverse problems; waveform inversion; ultrasound; tomography; BREAST-CANCER; US;
D O I
10.1117/12.2653575
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The convergence of waveform inversion in ultrasound tomography is heavily impacted by the choice of starting model. Ray tomography is often used as the starting model for waveform inversion; however, artifacts resulting from ray tomography can continue to persist during waveform inversion. On the other hand, a homogeneous starting model for waveform inversion may result in cycle skipping artifacts if the frequency of the transmitted waveform is too high or the error between the starting model and ground-truth is too large. Clinical in vivo breast data suggests that waveform inversion from a homogeneous starting model is sufficient for an accurate reconstruction of the speed of sound if the starting model is close enough to the average speed of sound in the medium and the starting frequency for waveform inversion is sufficiently low to avoid cycle skipping. Comparing the results of waveform inversion using ray tomography and a homogeneous sound speed as initial models, the homogeneous starting model avoids oscillatory artifacts produced by ray tomography at the edges of the breast. Although the RMS error between the two waveform inversion results is 29.6 m/s, most of the error is the result of reconstruction artifacts at the edges of the breast. When the RMS error is measured inside the breast away from its boundaries, this RMS error drops down to 11.5 m/s.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Open-Source Gauss-Newton-Based Methods for Refraction-Corrected Ultrasound Computed Tomography [J].
Ali, Rehman ;
Hsieh, Scott ;
Dahl, Jeremy .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 10955
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Medical Imaging 2010: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy
[3]  
Chen ZY, 2013, INT J NUMER ANAL MOD, V10, P389
[4]   Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: First results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype [J].
Duric, Nebojsa ;
Littrup, Peter ;
Poulo, Lou ;
Babkin, Alex ;
Pevzner, Roman ;
Holsapple, Earle ;
Rama, Olsi ;
Glide, Carri .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) :773-785
[5]   Full-waveform inversion imaging of the human brain [J].
Guasch, Lluis ;
Calderon Agudo, Oscar ;
Tang, Meng-Xing ;
Nachev, Parashkev ;
Warner, Michael .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 3 (01)
[6]   Adaptive waveform inversion: Practice [J].
Guasch, Lluis ;
Warner, Michael ;
Ravaut, Celine .
GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (03) :R447-R461
[7]   Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations [J].
Kolb, TM ;
Lichy, J ;
Newhouse, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) :165-175
[8]   Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US - Diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics [J].
Kolb, TM ;
Lichy, J ;
Newhouse, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (01) :191-199
[9]   Fast full-wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources [J].
Krebs, Jerome R. ;
Anderson, John E. ;
Hinkley, David ;
Neelamani, Ramesh ;
Lee, Sunwoong ;
Baumstein, Anatoly ;
Lacasse, Martin-Daniel .
GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 74 (06) :WCC177-WCC188
[10]   IN VIVO BREAST SOUND-SPEED IMAGING WITH ULTRASOUND TOMOGRAPHY [J].
Li, Cuiping ;
Duric, Nebojsa ;
Littrup, Peter ;
Huang, Lianjie .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 35 (10) :1615-1628