Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:2
作者
Han, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Xiaomeng [4 ]
Tian, Kun [5 ]
Shen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Jinlan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Nianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Single Cell Res & Liquid Biopsy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cost-effectiveness; capecitabine; maintenance therapy; real-world data; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; CISPLATIN; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RECURRENT; PLACEBO; PATIENT; HEALTH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMaintenance therapy with capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) has been confirmed to be effective. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine as maintenance therapy for patients with mNPC from the Chinese payers' perspective. MethodsMarkov model was conducted to simulate the disease progress and evaluated the economic and health outcomes of capecitabine maintenance plus best-supported care (CBSC) or best-supported care (BSC) alone for patients with mNPC. Survival data were derived from the NCT02460419 clinical trial. Costs and utilities were obtained from the standard fee database and published literature. Measured outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analyses were accomplished. ResultsThroughout the course of the disease, the CBSC group provide an incremental cost of $9 734 and additional 1.16 QALYs (1.56 LYs) compared with the BSC group, resulting in an ICUR of $8 391/QALY and ICER of $6 240/LY. Moreover, the INHB was 0.89 QALYs, and the INMB was $32 034 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36 007/QALY. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSC presented a positive trend of gaining an INHB in all subgroups compared with the BSC group. The results of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our model. ConclusionCompared with BSC, after induction chemotherapy, CBSC as a first-line treatment was cost-effective for newly diagnosed mNPC. These results suggest capecitabine maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy as a new option for patients with newly diagnosed mNPC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib compared to best supportive care in second line renal cell cancer from a payer perspective in Cyprus
    Petrou, Panagiotis
    Talias, Michael A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (01) : 131 - 138
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Liu, Lulu
    Wang, Lei
    Chen, Li
    Ding, Yiling
    Zhang, Qilin
    Shu, Yamin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [43] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China
    Zhou, Chongchong
    Wei, Jingxuan
    Xu, Kai
    Lin, Yingtao
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Xin
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2023, 16 : 2447 - 2458
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus tremelimumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liao, Weiting
    Xu, Huiqiong
    Hutton, David
    Wu, Qiuji
    Yang, Yang
    Feng, Mingyang
    Lei, Wanting
    Bai, Liangliang
    Li, Junying
    Li, Qiu
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16
  • [45] A randomized phase 3 study of maintenance therapy with S-1 plus best supportive care versus best supportive care after induction therapy with carboplatin plus S-1 for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG7512L)
    Tanaka, Kaoru
    Morita, Satoshi
    Ando, Masahiko
    Yokoyama, Takuma
    Nakamura, Atsushi
    Yoshioka, Hiroshige
    Ishiguro, Takashi
    Miura, Satoru
    Toyozawa, Ryo
    Oguri, Tetsuya
    Daga, Haruko
    Ko, Ryo
    Bessho, Akihiro
    Tachihara, Motoko
    Iwamoto, Yasuo
    Hirano, Katsuya
    Nakanishi, Yoichi
    Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Okamoto, Isamu
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (16) : 3648 - 3656
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China
    Xiang, Zuojuan
    Ma, Ling
    Fu, Yingzhou
    Pan, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [47] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isavuconazole vs. Voriconazole as First-Line Treatment for Invasive Aspergillosis
    Harrington, Rachel
    Lee, Edward
    Yang, Hongbo
    Wei, Jin
    Messali, Andrew
    Azie, Nkechi
    Wu, Eric Q.
    Spalding, James
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (01) : 207 - 220
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isavuconazole vs. Voriconazole as First-Line Treatment for Invasive Aspergillosis
    Rachel Harrington
    Edward Lee
    Hongbo Yang
    Jin Wei
    Andrew Messali
    Nkechi Azie
    Eric Q. Wu
    James Spalding
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 207 - 220
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness analysis of donafenib versus lenvatinib for first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
    Meng, Rui
    Zhang, Xueke
    Zhou, Ting
    Luo, Mengjie
    Qiu, Yijin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (07) : 1079 - 1086
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Su, Dan
    Wu, Bin
    Shi, Lizheng
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (02)