Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:2
作者
Han, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Xiaomeng [4 ]
Tian, Kun [5 ]
Shen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Jinlan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Nianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Single Cell Res & Liquid Biopsy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cost-effectiveness; capecitabine; maintenance therapy; real-world data; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; CISPLATIN; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RECURRENT; PLACEBO; PATIENT; HEALTH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMaintenance therapy with capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) has been confirmed to be effective. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine as maintenance therapy for patients with mNPC from the Chinese payers' perspective. MethodsMarkov model was conducted to simulate the disease progress and evaluated the economic and health outcomes of capecitabine maintenance plus best-supported care (CBSC) or best-supported care (BSC) alone for patients with mNPC. Survival data were derived from the NCT02460419 clinical trial. Costs and utilities were obtained from the standard fee database and published literature. Measured outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analyses were accomplished. ResultsThroughout the course of the disease, the CBSC group provide an incremental cost of $9 734 and additional 1.16 QALYs (1.56 LYs) compared with the BSC group, resulting in an ICUR of $8 391/QALY and ICER of $6 240/LY. Moreover, the INHB was 0.89 QALYs, and the INMB was $32 034 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36 007/QALY. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSC presented a positive trend of gaining an INHB in all subgroups compared with the BSC group. The results of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our model. ConclusionCompared with BSC, after induction chemotherapy, CBSC as a first-line treatment was cost-effective for newly diagnosed mNPC. These results suggest capecitabine maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy as a new option for patients with newly diagnosed mNPC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Gong, Jinhong
    Shang, Jingjing
    Su, Dan
    Qian, Xiaodan
    Liu, Guangjun
    Sun, Zhiqiang
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (06) : 709 - 717
  • [32] Erlotinib or best supportive care for third-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cromwell, Ian
    van der Hoek, Kimberly
    Taylor, Suzanne C. Malfair
    Melosky, Barbara
    Peacock, Stuart
    LUNG CANCER, 2012, 76 (03) : 472 - 477
  • [33] Final Overall Survival Analysis of the SOGUG Phase 2 MAJA Study: Maintenance Vinflunine Versus Best Supportive Care After First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Bellmunt Molins, Joaquim
    Garcia-Donas Jimenez, Jesus
    Valderrama, Begona P.
    Virizuela Echaburu, Juan Antonio
    Hernando-Polo, Susana
    Climent Duran, Miguel Angel
    Carlos Villa-Guzman, Jose
    Arranz Arija, Jose Angel
    Llorente Ostiategui, Mar
    Lainez Milagro, Nuria
    Gonzalez-del-Alba, Aranzazu
    Mellado Gonzalez, Begona
    Gallardo Diaz, Enrique
    Castellano Gauna, Daniel
    Domenech Santasusana, Montserrat
    Anido Herranz, Urbano
    del Muro Solans, Xavier Garcia
    Luis Perez-Gracia, Jose
    Puente Vazquez, Javier
    Morales-Barrera, Rafael
    Font Pous, Albert
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2020, 18 (06) : 452 - 460
  • [34] Immune checkpoint inhibition in first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A CAPTAIN-1st and JUPITER-02 trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis
    Tian, Kun
    Han, Jiaqi
    Wang, Zhu
    Chen, Jie
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 128
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of first-line metastatic NSCLC in China
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Li
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [36] First-line immunotherapy combinations for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Han, Jiaqi
    Zeng, Ni
    Tian, Kun
    Liu, Zijian
    She, Longjiang
    Wang, Zhu
    He, Jinlan
    Chen, Nianyong
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2023, 45 (09): : 2246 - 2258
  • [37] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers
    Chen, Ruijia
    Zhang, Yalan
    Lin, Kongying
    Huang, Defu
    You, MaoJin
    Lai, Yanjin
    Wang, Jinye
    Hu, Yingying
    Li, Na
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [38] Induction chemotherapy regimes in first-line treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Xu, Weilin
    Qiu, Lei
    Li, Feng
    Fei, Yinjiao
    Wei, Qiran
    Shi, Kexin
    Zhu, Yuchen
    Luo, Jinyan
    Wu, Mengxing
    Yuan, Jinling
    Liu, Huifang
    Mao, Jiahui
    Cao, Yuandong
    Zhou, Shu
    Guan, Xin
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 154
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Wang, Siying
    Xie, Ouyang
    Wu, Meiyu
    Xiang, Heng
    Tan, Chongqing
    Wan, Xiaomin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [40] A Dutch cost-effectiveness analysis of fremanezumab versus best supportive care in patients with chronic migraine and inadequate response to prior preventive therapy
    Wolters, Sharon
    Carpay, Johannes A.
    Pronk, Marja H.
    Zuurbier, Karin W. M.
    Driessen, Maurice T.
    Lyras, Leonidas
    Postma, Maarten J.
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)