Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Xiaomeng [4 ]
Tian, Kun [5 ]
Shen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Jinlan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Nianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Single Cell Res & Liquid Biopsy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cost-effectiveness; capecitabine; maintenance therapy; real-world data; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; CISPLATIN; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RECURRENT; PLACEBO; PATIENT; HEALTH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMaintenance therapy with capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) has been confirmed to be effective. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine as maintenance therapy for patients with mNPC from the Chinese payers' perspective. MethodsMarkov model was conducted to simulate the disease progress and evaluated the economic and health outcomes of capecitabine maintenance plus best-supported care (CBSC) or best-supported care (BSC) alone for patients with mNPC. Survival data were derived from the NCT02460419 clinical trial. Costs and utilities were obtained from the standard fee database and published literature. Measured outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analyses were accomplished. ResultsThroughout the course of the disease, the CBSC group provide an incremental cost of $9 734 and additional 1.16 QALYs (1.56 LYs) compared with the BSC group, resulting in an ICUR of $8 391/QALY and ICER of $6 240/LY. Moreover, the INHB was 0.89 QALYs, and the INMB was $32 034 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36 007/QALY. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSC presented a positive trend of gaining an INHB in all subgroups compared with the BSC group. The results of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our model. ConclusionCompared with BSC, after induction chemotherapy, CBSC as a first-line treatment was cost-effective for newly diagnosed mNPC. These results suggest capecitabine maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy as a new option for patients with newly diagnosed mNPC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus pazopanib and best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chile: cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed treatment comparison
    Vargas, C.
    Balmaceda, C.
    Rodriguez, F.
    Rojas, R.
    Giglio, A.
    Espinoza, M. A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (05) : 609 - 617
  • [22] Metronomic capecitabine vs. best supportive care in Child-Pugh B hepatocellular carcinoma: a proof of concept
    De Lorenzo, Stefania
    Tovoli, Francesco
    Barbera, Maria Aurelia
    Garuti, Francesca
    Palloni, Andrea
    Frega, Giorgio
    Garajova, Ingrid
    Rizzo, Alessandro
    Trevisani, Franco
    Brandi, Giovanni
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer
    Pei, Zhengda
    Xiao, Ningping
    Yang, Pei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Giuliani, Jacopo
    Mantoan, Beatrice
    Bonetti, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chaohui Jin
    Hanrui Zheng
    Mei Zhan
    Feng Wen
    Ting Xu
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2020, 277 : 577 - 584
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Jin, Chaohui
    Zheng, Hanrui
    Zhan, Mei
    Wen, Feng
    Xu, Ting
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 277 (02) : 577 - 584
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab/irinotecan vs active/best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have failed previous chemotherapy treatment
    Starling, N.
    Tilden, D.
    White, J.
    Cunningham, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 96 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab/irinotecan vs active/best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have failed previous chemotherapy treatment
    N Starling
    D Tilden
    J White
    D Cunningham
    British Journal of Cancer, 2007, 96 : 206 - 212
  • [29] Metronomic capecitabine versus best supportive care as second-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study
    Gardini, Andrea Casadei
    Foca, Flavia
    Scartozzi, Mario
    Silvestris, Nicola
    Tamburini, Emiliano
    Faloppi, Luca
    Brunetti, Oronzo
    Rudnas, Britt
    Pisconti, Salvatore
    Valgiusti, Martina
    Marisi, Giorgia
    Foschi, Francesco Giuseppe
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Tassinari, Davide
    Cascinu, Stefano
    Frassineti, Giovanni Luca
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [30] A randomized, phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus best supportive care as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin for advanced, non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer
    Nabil Mubarak
    Rabab Gaafar
    Samir Shehata
    Tarek Hashem
    Dani Abigeres
    Hamdy A Azim
    Gamal El-Husseiny
    Hamed Al-Husaini
    Zhixin Liu
    BMC Cancer, 12