Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Jiaqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lan, Xiaomeng [4 ]
Tian, Kun [5 ]
Shen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Jinlan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Nianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Single Cell Res & Liquid Biopsy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cost-effectiveness; capecitabine; maintenance therapy; real-world data; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; CISPLATIN; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RECURRENT; PLACEBO; PATIENT; HEALTH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMaintenance therapy with capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) has been confirmed to be effective. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine as maintenance therapy for patients with mNPC from the Chinese payers' perspective. MethodsMarkov model was conducted to simulate the disease progress and evaluated the economic and health outcomes of capecitabine maintenance plus best-supported care (CBSC) or best-supported care (BSC) alone for patients with mNPC. Survival data were derived from the NCT02460419 clinical trial. Costs and utilities were obtained from the standard fee database and published literature. Measured outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analyses were accomplished. ResultsThroughout the course of the disease, the CBSC group provide an incremental cost of $9 734 and additional 1.16 QALYs (1.56 LYs) compared with the BSC group, resulting in an ICUR of $8 391/QALY and ICER of $6 240/LY. Moreover, the INHB was 0.89 QALYs, and the INMB was $32 034 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $36 007/QALY. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSC presented a positive trend of gaining an INHB in all subgroups compared with the BSC group. The results of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our model. ConclusionCompared with BSC, after induction chemotherapy, CBSC as a first-line treatment was cost-effective for newly diagnosed mNPC. These results suggest capecitabine maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy as a new option for patients with newly diagnosed mNPC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs. Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Xie, Qian
    Zheng, Hanrui
    Chen, Ye
    Peng, Xingchen
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [2] A cost-effectiveness analysis of avelumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone as first-line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan
    Su, Po-Jung
    Xiao, Ying
    Lin, Amy Y.
    Goh, Connie
    Wu, Ethan
    Liu, Kevin
    Chou, Patrick
    Kuo, Kaitlin
    Palencia, Roberto
    Chang, Jane
    Kearney, Mairead
    Kapetanakis, Venediktos
    Benedict, Agnes
    CANCER REPORTS, 2023,
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of avelumab maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (vol 10, 837854, 2022)
    Xie, Qian
    Zheng, Hanrui
    Chen, Ye
    Peng, Xingchen
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [4] Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care Alone on Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Who Had Received Induction Chemotherapy A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Liu, Guo-Ying
    Li, Wang-Zhong
    Wang, De-Shen
    Liang, Hu
    Lv, Xing
    Ye, Yan-Fang
    Zhao, Chong
    Ke, Liang-Ru
    Lv, Shu-Hui
    Lu, Nian
    Bei, Wei-Xin
    Cai, Zhuo-Chen
    Chen, Xi
    Liang, Chi-Xiong
    Guo, Xiang
    Xia, Wei-Xiong
    Xiang, Yan-Qun
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (04) : 553 - 561
  • [5] Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Grivas, Petros
    Kopyltsov, Evgeny
    Su, Po-Jung
    Parnis, Francis X.
    Park, Se Hoon
    Yamamoto, Yoshiaki
    Fong, Peter C.
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Duran, Miguel A. Climent
    Bamias, Aristotelis
    Caserta, Claudia
    Chang, Jane
    Cislo, Paul
    di Pietro, Alessandra
    Wang, Jing
    Powles, Thomas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (04) : 320 - 328
  • [6] Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Asian subgroup analysis
    Lee, Jae-Lyun
    Desai, Chirag
    Park, Se Hoon
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Su, Po-Jung
    Chan, Timothy Tim Wai
    Gurney, Howard
    Gao, Seasea
    Wang, Jing
    Sandner, Robin
    di Pietro, Alessandra
    Eto, Masatoshi
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (05) : 256.e17 - 256.e25
  • [7] Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Japanese subgroup analysis
    Tomita, Yoshihiko
    Yamamoto, Yoshiaki
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Kanayama, Hiroomi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Powles, Thomas
    Yoshida, Mizuki
    Koide, Yuichiro
    Umeyama, Yoshiko
    di Pietro, Alessandra
    Uemura, Hirotsugu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (02) : 383 - 395
  • [8] Cost-Utility Analysis of Maintenance Pemetrexed Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Jordan
    Al Rabayah, Abeer
    Al Froukh, Rawan
    Sawalha, Razan
    Al Shnekat, Maali
    Jahn, Beate
    Siebert, Uwe
    Jaddoua, Saad M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2024, 43
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chen, Xudong
    Liang, Weiting
    Wan, Ning
    Zhang, Li
    Yang, Yunpeng
    Jiang, Jie
    Zhang, Tiantian
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 94 : 80 - 85
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Franken, M. D.
    van Rooijen, E. M.
    May, A. M.
    Koffijberg, H.
    van Tinteren, H.
    Mol, L.
    ten Tije, A. J.
    Creemers, G. J.
    van der Velden, A. M. T.
    Tanis, B. C.
    Groot, C. A. Uyl-de
    Punt, C. J. A.
    Koopman, M.
    van Oijen, M. G. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 75 : 204 - 212