Quality Journalism in Social Media - What We Know and Where We Need to Dig Deeper

被引:5
作者
Degen, Matthias [1 ]
Olgemoeller, Max [1 ]
Zabel, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Westphalian Univ, Inst Journalism & Publ Relat, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
[2] TH Koln Univ Appl Sci, Schmalenbach Sch Business & Econ, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Journalism quality; digital quality journalism; social media journalism; social media literature review; journalistic roles; social media adaptation; POLITICAL JOURNALISTS; DIGITAL JOURNALISM; NEWS; AUDIENCES; FRAMEWORK; FACEBOOK; WEB; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/1461670X.2024.2314204
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
While research on journalism in social media is extensive and approaches the topic from different perspectives, the consideration of what contributes to quality journalism in social media is underdeveloped. Our paper addresses this by providing a comprehensive literature review of journalism research relating to aspects of quality in social media. Based on a systematic Scopus search, 54 peer-reviewed, English-language papers published between 2015 and 2022 were selected for in-depth textual analysis using MAXQDA. Two important takeaways emerge from the analysis. First, the literature suggests that journalists and media organizations adapt work routines, norms, and values in a context-sensitive manner when producing content for social media. By enabling many-to-many communication, social media platforms force journalists and media outlets to reflect on audience demands and to develop audience engagement strategies. Second, the findings underscore that journalistic social media activities diverge depending on how individual journalists and organizations approach journalistic quality in social media. As these findings are only pieces to the puzzle of what quality journalism in social media entails, we hope to encourage further research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 420
页数:22
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Journalism as a public good: A Scandinavian perspective [J].
Allern, Sigurd ;
Pollack, Ester .
JOURNALISM, 2019, 20 (11) :1423-1439
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Journalism on the Internet. Profession, Participation
[3]  
Arnold K., 2008, PUBLIZISTIK, V53, P488, DOI DOI 10.1007/PL00022233
[4]  
Arnold Klaus., 2016, HDB JOURNALISMUSTHEO, P551, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-18966-634
[5]   Online/offscreen: On changing technology and practices in television journalism [J].
Ashuri, Tamar ;
Frenkel, Atara .
CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 23 (02) :148-165
[6]   Defining and Measuring News Media Quality: Comparing the Content Perspective and the Audience Perspective [J].
Bachmann, Philipp ;
Eisenegger, Mark ;
Ingenhoff, Diana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2022, 27 (01) :9-37
[7]   A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media [J].
Badham, Mark ;
Mykkanen, Markus .
MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2022, 10 (01) :54-65
[8]   A question of perspective: Exploring audiences' views of journalistic boundaries [J].
Banjac, Sandra ;
Hanusch, Folker .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2022, 24 (03) :705-723
[9]   'Tweet or be sacked': Twitter and the new elements of journalistic practice [J].
Barnard, Stephen R. .
JOURNALISM, 2016, 17 (02) :190-207
[10]   Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter? [J].
Bentivegna, Sara ;
Marchetti, Rita .
JOURNALISM, 2018, 19 (02) :270-290