Accuracy (trueness and precision) of four tablet-based applications for three-dimensional facial scanning: An in-vitro study

被引:13
作者
Kuhlman, Deise Caldas [1 ]
Almuzian, Mohammed [2 ]
Coppini, Christianne [1 ]
Alzoubi, Emad Eddin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malta, Fac Dent Surg, Med Sch, Dept Child Dent Hlth & Orthodont, MSD-2080 Msida, Malta
[2] Univ Edinburgh, ASMD Coll, Edinburgh Med Sch, Dept Orthodont, Lauriston Bldg, Lauriston Pl, Edinburgh EH3 9HA, Scotland
关键词
Imaging; Structured light scanning; Face analysis; Accuracy; Precision; Three-dimensional; SYSTEM; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; VALIDATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RELIABILITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104533
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the overall and regional accuracy (trueness and precision) of digital three-dimensional (3D) facial scans obtained from four tablet-based applications, which were (Bellus) the Bellus Dental Pro & REG; (Bellus3D, Inc. Campbell, CA, USA), (Capture) the Capture & REG;: 3D Scan Anything (Standard Cyborg, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA), (Heges) the Heges & REG; (by Marek Simonik, Ostrava, North Moravia, Czech Republic), and (Scandy) the Scandy Pro 3D Scanner & REG; (Scandy LLC, New Orleans, LA, USA). Methods: A mannequin's face was marked with 63 landmarks. Subsequently, it was scanned 5 times using each scan application on an iPad Pro & REG; (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA). The digital measurements were obtained with MeshLab & REG; (CNR-ISTI, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy) and compared to the manual measurements using a digital vernier calliper (Truper Herramientas S.A., Colonia Granada, Mexico City, Mexico). The absolute mean differ-ence and the standard deviation of the dimensional discrepancies were calculated. Moreover, the data were analysed by using one-way ANOVA, Levene's test, and Bonferroni & PRIME;s correction. Results: The absolute mean trueness values were Bellus 0.41 & PLUSMN; 0.35 mm, Capture 0.38 & PLUSMN; 0.37 mm, Heges 0.39 & PLUSMN; 0.38 mm, and Scandy 0.47 & PLUSMN; 0.44 mm. Moreover, precision values were Bellus 0.46 mm, Capture 0.46 mm, Heges 0.54 mm, and Scandy 0.64 mm. Comparing the regions, Capture and Scandy showed the highest absolute mean difference, which was 0.81 mm in the Frontal and Zygomaticofacial regions, respectively. Conclusions: The trueness and precision of all four tablet-based applications were clinically acceptable for diagnosis and treatment planning. Clinical significance: The future of the three-dimensional facial scan is auspicious, and it has the potential to be affordable, accurate, and of great value for clinicians in their daily practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   A Review of Multimodal Facial Biometric Authentication Methods in Mobile Devices and their Application in Head Mounted Displays [J].
Olade, Ilesanmi ;
Liang, Hai-Ning ;
Fleming, Charles .
2018 IEEE SMARTWORLD, UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING, ADVANCED & TRUSTED COMPUTING, SCALABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS, CLOUD & BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTERNET OF PEOPLE AND SMART CITY INNOVATION (SMARTWORLD/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCOM/IOP/SCI), 2018, :1997-2004
[32]   A Mobile Structured Light System for 3D Face Acquisition [J].
Piccirilli, Marco ;
Doretto, Gianfranco ;
Ross, Arun ;
Adjeroh, Donald .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (07) :1854-1855
[33]   Accuracy (trueness and precision) of a dual-structured light facial scanner and interexaminer reliability [J].
Piedra-Cascon, Wenceslao ;
Meyer, Matthew J. ;
Methani, Mohammad M. ;
Revilla-Leon, Marta .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (05) :567-574
[34]   Comparison of three-dimensional surface scanning techniques for capturing the external ear [J].
Ross, Maureen T. ;
Cruz, Rena ;
Brooks-Richards, Trent L. ;
Hafner, Louise M. ;
Powell, Sean K. ;
Woodruff, Maria A. .
VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2018, 13 (04) :255-265
[35]   Kinect range sensing: Structured-light versus Time-of-Flight Kinect [J].
Sarbolandi, Hamed ;
Lefloch, Damien ;
Kolb, Andreas .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2015, 139 :1-20
[36]   A Web-Based, Integrated Simulation System for Craniofacial Surgical Planning [J].
Schendel, Stephen A. ;
Montgomery, Kevin .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (03) :1099-1106
[37]   Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging [J].
Secher, Jesper Jared ;
Darvann, Tron Andre ;
Pinholt, Else Marie .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (10) :1662-1670
[38]   Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs [J].
Stebel, Adam ;
Desmedt, Dries ;
Bronkhorst, Ewald ;
Kuijpers, Mette A. ;
Fudalej, Piotr S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (02) :197-201
[39]   Depth accuracy of the RealSense F200: Low-cost 4D facial imaging [J].
ten Harkel, Timen C. ;
Speksnijder, Caroline M. ;
van der Heijden, Ferdinand ;
Beurskens, Carien H. G. ;
Ingels, Koen J. A. O. ;
Maal, Thomas J. J. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[40]   Comparison of iPad Pro(R)'s LiDAR and TrueDepth Capabilities with an Industrial 3D Scanning Solution [J].
Vogt, Maximilian ;
Rips, Adrian ;
Emmelmann, Claus .
TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 9 (02)