Road traffic safety assessment in self-driving vehicles based on time-to-collision with motion orientation

被引:9
作者
Ortiz, Fernando M. [1 ]
Sammarco, Matteo [2 ]
Detyniecki, Marcin [2 ]
Costa, Luis Henrique M. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, GTA, PEE, COPPE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] AXA Grp, Paris, France
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Surrogate Safety Measures; Autonomous vehicles; Smart mobility; Road safety; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; BRAKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107172
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Traffic conflict analysis based on Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) helps to estimate the risk level of an ego-vehicle interacting with other road users. Nonetheless, risk assessment for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is still incipient, given that most of the AVs are currently prototypes and current SSMs do not directly apply to autonomous driving styles. Therefore, to assess and quantify the potential risk arising from AV interactions with other road users, this study introduces the TTCmo (Time-to-Collision with motion orientation), a metric that considers the yaw angle of conflicting objects. In fact, the yaw angle represents the orientation of the other road users and objects detected by the AV sensors, enabling a better identification of potential risk events from changes in the motion orientation and position through the geometric analysis of the boundaries for each detected object. Using the 3D object detection data annotations available from the publicly available AV datasets nuScenes and Lyft5 and the TTCmo metric, we find that at least 8% of the interactions with objects detected around the AV present some risk level. This is meaningful, since it is possible to reduce the proportion of data analyzed by up to 60% when replacing regular TTC by our improved TTC computation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Simulation-based Model for Surrogate Safety Measures Analysis in Automated Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflict on an Urban Environment [J].
Alghodhaifi, Hesham ;
Lakshmanan, Sridhar .
AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS: SENSORS, PROCESSING, AND SECURITY FOR VEHICLES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 2020, 2020, 11415
[2]   Evaluating the safety of autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interactions: An extreme value theory approach [J].
Alozi, Abdul Razak ;
Hussein, Mohamed .
ANALYTIC METHODS IN ACCIDENT RESEARCH, 2022, 35
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, HZ 300 GHZ STANDARD, P1
[4]   Intersection Safety using Lidar and Stereo Vision sensors [J].
Aycard, Olivier ;
Baig, Qadeer ;
Bota, Siviu ;
Nashashibi, Fawzi ;
Nedevschi, Sergiu ;
Pantilie, Cosmin ;
Parent, Michel ;
Resende, Paulo ;
Vu, Trung-Dung .
2011 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2011, :863-869
[5]   Study of automated shuttle interactions in city traffic using surrogate measures of safety [J].
Beauchamp, Etienne ;
Saunier, Nicolas ;
Cloutier, Marie-Soleil .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 135
[6]   Autonomous Driving-A Crash Explained in Detail [J].
Betz, Johannes ;
Heilmeier, Alexander ;
Wischnewski, Alexander ;
Stahl, Tim ;
Lienkamp, Markus .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (23)
[7]   nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving [J].
Caesar, Holger ;
Bankiti, Varun ;
Lang, Alex H. ;
Vora, Sourabh ;
Liong, Venice Erin ;
Xu, Qiang ;
Krishnan, Anush ;
Pan, Yu ;
Baldan, Giancarlo ;
Beijbom, Oscar .
2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2020), 2020, :11618-11628
[8]  
Campbell K.L., 2012, The shrp 2 naturalistic driving study
[9]  
De Ceunynck T., 2022, TRAFFIC SAF RES, V2, DOI 10.55329/
[10]  
Dingus T.A, 2006, The 100-car naturalistic driving study, phase II-results of the 100-car field experiment