Pharmacological labour pain interventions: South African midwives' perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Parkies, LE. [2 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Okafor, UB. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ft Hare, Dept Publ Hlth, 5 Oxford St, ZA-5021 East London, South Africa
[2] Univ Ft Hare, Dept Nursing Sci, 50 Church St, ZA-5021 East London, South Africa
[3] Univ Ft Hare, Fac Hlth Sci, 5 Oxford St, ZA-5201 East London, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Midwife; Labour pain; Pharmacological relief pain; Interventions; INTRAVENOUS-INFUSION; MANAGEMENT; PETHIDINE; PARACETAMOL; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY; RELIEF; ZONE;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-024-01844-w
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundWomen of childbearing age feel great about giving birth, but the pain could be excruciating depending on their pain tolerances. Midwives requires obstetrical knowledge and skills such as pain management during labour and safety. We explored midwives' perspectives on the utilisation of pharmacological pain alleviation interventions during labour in selected hospitals in Matjhabeng Municipality, Free State province, South Africa. A qualitative study was undertaken, involving a sample of ten midwives, using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Tesch's open coding data analysis method was applied to analyse the data. The midwives were restricted to use Pethidine and Phenergan prescribed by doctors for labour pain relief, which disrupted labour pain management and obliged them either to wait for a physician or follow telephone instructions. According to the midwives, women taking Pethidine and Phenergan encountered adverse effects and discomfort. Midwives identified high workload, inadequate personnel, lack of skill and knowledge, lack of medication availability, and lack of infrastructure as the primary challenges of administering pharmacological methods to women in labour. The lack of standing orders, which delays the administration of medications pending a physician's prescription, constituted an additional difficulty. In the instance that Pethidine and Phenergan were unavailable or ineffective for some women, the midwives recommended that women be administered alternative pharmacological pain relievers. They also advocated for institutionalization of pharmacological guidelines allowing them to use their discretion when treating labour pain. Midwives can only utilise a few standardised and regulated pharmacological medications for labour pain management. The midwives' ability to administer pharmacological pain relief during labour was hampered by a high workload burden, insufficient staff, lack of skill and understanding, drug unavailability, and inadequate infrastructure. Midwives advocated for supported guidelines that would allow them to treat labour pain at their discretion. Intersectoral stakeholders are required to improve midwife skills and attitudes. Health facilities need to train and supply analgesics to midwives. Midwives ought to be familiar with pharmacological pain relievers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in pregnancy, labour and postpartum: A systematic review
    Dominguez-Solis, Esther
    Lima-Serrano, Marta
    Lima-Rodriguez, Joaquin Salvador
    MIDWIFERY, 2021, 102
  • [32] Labour market interventions to assist the unemployed in two townships in South Africa
    Paver, Rachele
    Rothmann, Sebastiaan
    van den Broeck, Anja
    de Witte, Hans
    SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 45
  • [33] Non-pharmacological interventions for pain in people with dementia: A systematic review
    Liao, Yo-Jen
    Parajuli, Jyotsana
    Jao, Ying-Ling
    Kitko, Lisa
    Berish, Diane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 124
  • [34] Non-pharmacological interventions for alleviating pain during orthodontic treatment
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    Strydom, Hardus
    Katsaros, Christos
    MacDonald, L. C. I.
    Curatolo, Michele
    Fudalej, Piotr
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12):
  • [35] Plasticity: Implications for opioid and other pharmacological interventions in specific pain states
    Dickenson, AH
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1997, 20 (03) : 392 - +
  • [36] Midwives' attitudes towards supporting normal labour and birth A cross-sectional study in South Germany
    Zinsser, Laura A.
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Gross, Mechthild M.
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 39 : 98 - 102
  • [37] A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain
    Kuijpers, T.
    van Middelkoop, M.
    Rubinstein, S. M.
    Ostelo, R.
    Verhagen, A.
    Koes, B. W.
    van Tulder, M. W.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for endotracheal suctioning pain in preterm infants: A systematic review
    Cai, Qian
    Luo, Wen
    Zhou, You
    Yin, Yue
    Zhu, Kai
    Shi, Huan
    Liao, Yuexia
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (02): : 424 - 434
  • [39] Effectiveness of technology-based interventions compared with other non-pharmacological interventions for relieving procedural pain in hospitalized neonates: a systematic review
    Palomaa, Anna-Kaija
    Huhtala, Saija
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Poelkki, Tarja
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (08) : 1549 - 1581
  • [40] Strategic Planning for Transformational Government A South African Perspective
    Mawela, Tendani
    2012 E-LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE E-GOVERNMENT AND E-BUSINESS INNOVATIONS (E-LEADERSHIP), 2012,