A comparative study on the accuracy of an automated multi-parameter high-dose-rate brachytherapy quality assurance system

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Jia, Mengyu [2 ]
Yuan, Zhiyong [1 ]
Qian, Shaowen [3 ]
Zhang, Daguang [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol,Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Precis Instrument & Optoelect Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] 960th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force PLA, Dept Med Imaging, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-dose-rate brachytherapy; Quality assurance; Afterloader; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; AAPM;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111472
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aims to explore the measuring accuracy of an automated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) quality assurance system (hereinafter referred to as OriQA system) that could provide simultaneous measurements of dwell position, dwell time and source strength in a single test. Elekta-Flexitron was selected as the HDR BT afterloader, and measured the farthest transmission distance by source position simulator. Within the effective distance, we set dwell positions in two groups, specifically, plan_1 with an interval of 2.00 cm: 106.00 cm, 108.00 cm, 110.00 cm, 102.00 cm, 104.00 cm, 106.00 cm, 108.00 cm, and plan_2 with an interval of 0.20 cm: 111.40 cm, 111.60 cm, 111.80 cm, 112.00 cm, 112.20 cm, 112.40 cm, 112.60 cm. The measured values collected from OriQA device were compared with the data from traditional HDR BT QA tool (source position check ruler). Three groups of dwell time were set, specifically, plan_1: with fixed dwell time 2.00 s, plan_3 with interval 0.10 s: 3.70 s, 3.80 s, 3.90 s, 4.00 s, 4.10 s, 4.20 s, 4.30 s, and plan_4: fixed dwell time 5.00 s. Source strength was also measured continuously for a period of 10 weeks, and compared with the data collected from the well-chamber. The OriQA system showed reliable performance in the evaluation of measuring accuracy. The adjusted farthest transmission distance was 119.33 cm. And according to the time-position graph, the maximum deviation of dwell position between the measured and planned data was 0.34 mm, which was smaller than that between the ruler and planed data (0.75 mm). The maximum deviation of dwell time between the measured and planned data was 0.05 s. Fitting analysis revealed linear relationship between source strength Sk and the intensity detector response, with R2 = 0.9877, and intensity deviation fluctuated between 1.14% and 2.19%. Compared with the traditional QA tool, the OriQA device provided improved measuring accuracy and efficiency QA procedure for HDR BT.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Mechanical evaluation of the Bravos afterloader system for HDR brachytherapy
    Bellezzo, Murillo
    Baeza, Jose A.
    Voncken, Robert
    Reniers, Brigitte
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Fonseca, Gabriel P.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (06) : 852 - 862
  • [2] The evaluation of a 2D diode array in "magic phantom" for use in high dose rate brachytherapy pretreatment quality assurance
    Espinoza, A.
    Petasecca, M.
    Fuduli, I.
    Howie, A.
    Bucci, J.
    Corde, S.
    Jackson, M.
    Lerch, M. L. F.
    Rosenfeld, A. B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (02) : 663 - 673
  • [3] High dose-rate brachytherapy source position quality assurance using radiochromic film
    Evans, M. D. C.
    Devic, S.
    Podgorsak, E. B.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2007, 32 (01) : 13 - 15
  • [4] A novel system for commissioning brachytherapy applicators: example of a ring applicator
    Fonseca, Gabriel P.
    Van den Bosch, Michiel R.
    Voncken, Robert
    Podesta, Mark
    Verhaegen, Frank
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (21) : 8360 - 8375
  • [5] Automated multi-parameter high-dose-rate brachytherapy quality assurance via radioluminescence imaging
    Jia, Mengyu
    Kim, Tae Jin
    Yang, Yong
    Xing, Lei
    Jean, Paul De
    Grafil, Elliot
    Jenkins, Cesare H.
    Fahimian, Benjamin P.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (22)
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Brachytherapy
    Jia, Xun
    Albuquerque, Kevin
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 389 - 399
  • [7] Three-Dimensional Printed Plate-Guided 125I Brachytherapy for Malignant Parotid Tumors
    Liu, Jinyuan
    Wu, Tianfu
    Man, Qiwen
    Fidele, Nyimi Bushabu
    Zheng, Yueyu
    Liu, Bing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (10) : 2113 - 2121
  • [8] Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56
    Nath, R
    Anderson, LL
    Meli, JA
    Olch, AJ
    Stitt, JA
    Williamson, JF
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (10) : 1557 - 1598
  • [9] Dose calculation for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources with average energy higher than 50 keV: Report of the AAPM and ESTRO
    Perez-Calatayud, Jose
    Ballester, Facundo
    Das, Rupak K.
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Meigooni, Ali S.
    Ouhib, Zoubir
    Rivard, Mark J.
    Sloboda, Ron S.
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2904 - 2929
  • [10] HDR brachytherapy invivo source position verification using a 2D diode array: A Monte Carlo study
    Poder, Joel
    Cutajar, Dean
    Guatelli, Susanna
    Petasecca, Marco
    Howie, Andrew
    Bucci, Joseph
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04): : 163 - 172