Performance of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging validated by targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies

被引:3
作者
Hsi, Richard A. [1 ,6 ]
Dinh, Tru-Khang [2 ]
Greer, Matthew [2 ]
Bensen, Carleen [3 ]
Mitchell, Marc A. [4 ]
Li, Amy Y. [4 ]
Stamm, Andrew [4 ]
Henne, Manfred [5 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Peninsula, Poulsbo, WA USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Olymp Med Ctr, Port Angeles, WA USA
[4] Doctors Clin, Silverdale, WA USA
[5] Rayus Imaging, Poulsbo, WA USA
[6] Seattle Canc Care Alliance Peninsula, 19917 7th Ave NE, Suite 100, Poulsbo, WA 98370 USA
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
MR-guided biopsy; multiparametric prostate MRI; PI-RADS score; prostate cancer; transperineal biopsy; VERSION; 2; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo measure the performance of multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify intraprostatic tumour deposits using a systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal prostate biopsy technique.Materials and MethodsPatients underwent a combined systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal biopsy procedure in the dorsal lithotomy position under general anaesthesia. Systematic biopsies were spaced 10 mm or less apart and additional biopsies targeted any Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3, 4 or 5 lesions identified on mpMRI. Cancer detection rates were calculated on a per patient and per lesion basis.ResultsA total of 125 patients underwent the biopsy procedure. The positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI per patient was 59% for any cancer and 49% for Gleason score (GS) >= 7 cancer. The negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI per patient was 67% for any cancer and 88% for GS >= 7 cancer. On a per lesion basis, the PPV of PI-RADS 3 lesions for any and GS >= 7 cancer was 24% and 10%. For PI-RADS 4 lesions it was 42% and 32%. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, it was 76% and 70%. MpMRI failed to identify GS >= 7 cancer found on systematic biopsy in 22% of patients.ConclusionBased on a combination of systematic and targeted transperineal prostate biopsies, mpMRI showed a high NPV and low PPV for GS >= 7 cancer on a per patient basis. The PPV of mpMRI on a per lesion basis increased with increasing PI-RADS score. However, there were a significant number of both false positive as well as false negative (mpMRI invisible) areas within the prostate that contained GS >= 7 cancer. Therefore, pathologic confirmation using both targeted and systematic mapping biopsy is necessary to accurately identify all intraprostatic tumour deposits.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 103
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] The Index Lesion and the Origin of Prostate Cancer
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (17) : 1704 - 1706
  • [3] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [4] PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know
    Barrett, T.
    Turkbey, B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1165 - 1176
  • [5] What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate
    Borofsky, Samuel
    George, Arvin K.
    Gaur, Sonia
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Taffel, Myles
    Moreno, Vanesa
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) : 186 - 195
  • [6] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [7] Focal salvage therapy for local prostate cancer recurrences after primary radiotherapy: a comprehensive review
    Duijzentkunst, D. A. Smit
    Peters, M.
    van Zyp, J. R. N. van der Voort
    Moerland, M. A.
    van Vulpen, M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (11) : 1521 - 1531
  • [8] Eggener SE, 2007, J UROLOGY, V178, P2260, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.072
  • [9] Prostate irradiation with focal dose escalation to the intraprostatic dominant nodule: a systematic review
    Feutren, Thomas
    Herrera, Fernanda G.
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 6 (03) : 75 - 87
  • [10] Chromosomal anomalies in stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma primary tumors and lymph node metastases detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Gburek, BM
    Kollmorgen, TA
    Qian, JQ
    DSouzaGburek, SM
    Lieber, MM
    Jenkins, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) : 223 - 227