Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey

被引:21
|
作者
Celik, Sefa [1 ]
Peker, Iskender [2 ]
Gok-Kisa, A. Cansu [3 ]
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [4 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Dept Business Adm, Erzurum, Turkiye
[2] Gumushane Univ, Dept Business Adm, Gumushane, Turkiye
[3] Hitit Univ, Dept Int Trade & Logist, Corum, Turkiye
[4] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Medical waste management; IFMCDM; IFAHP; IFTOPSIS; GDM; HEALTH-CARE WASTE; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DISPOSAL; ALTERNATIVES; COLLECTION; OPTIMIZATION; TOPSIS; CITY; ISTANBUL;
D O I
10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hos-pitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
    Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
    Gul, Muhammet
    Lopez-Meza, Pedro
    Yucesan, Melih
    Navarro-Jimenez, Eduardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 49
  • [32] EVALUATION OF GROUP DECISION MAKING BASED ON GROUP PREFERENCES UNDER A MULTI-CRITERIA ENVIRONMENT
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Xu, Zeshui
    Kou, Gang
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2020, 26 (06) : 1187 - 1212
  • [33] A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment
    Vahdani, Behnam
    Mousavi, S. Meysam
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    Hashemi, H.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (04) : 1781 - 1799
  • [34] A modified interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method and its application to multi-criteria selection among renewable energy alternatives in Turkey
    Deveci, Kaan
    Cin, Rabia
    Kagizman, Ahmet
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 96
  • [35] Comparison and evaluation of multi-criteria supplier selection approaches: A case study
    Alkahtani, Mohammed
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman
    Kaid, Husam
    Sonboa, Mohammed
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [36] INTEGRATED FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPLICATION WITHIN AN ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK: A CASE STUDY IN TURKIYE
    Tai, Mehmet Ali
    Yetgin, Serap Akcan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2024, 31 (04): : 734 - 757
  • [37] Comparison of solid waste management scenarios based on life cycle analysis and multi-criteria decision making (Case study: Isfahan city)
    Nouri, J.
    Omrani, Gh. Ali
    Arjmandi, R.
    Kermani, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSACTION A-SCIENCE, 2014, 38 (A3): : 257 - 264
  • [38] Some new hybrid weighted aggregation operators under hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment
    Liao, Huchang
    Xu, Zeshui
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 26 (04) : 1601 - 1617
  • [39] A multi-criteria evaluation model based on hesitant fuzzy sets for blockchain technology in supply chain management
    Colaka, Murat
    Kaya, Ihsan
    Ozkan, Betul
    Budakc, Aysenur
    Karasan, Ali
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (01) : 935 - 946
  • [40] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for Renewable Energy Plants Location Selection in Vietnam under a Fuzzy Environment
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Huang, Ying-Fang
    Chai, Yu-Chien
    Van Thanh Nguyen
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (11):