Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey

被引:21
|
作者
Celik, Sefa [1 ]
Peker, Iskender [2 ]
Gok-Kisa, A. Cansu [3 ]
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [4 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Dept Business Adm, Erzurum, Turkiye
[2] Gumushane Univ, Dept Business Adm, Gumushane, Turkiye
[3] Hitit Univ, Dept Int Trade & Logist, Corum, Turkiye
[4] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Medical waste management; IFMCDM; IFAHP; IFTOPSIS; GDM; HEALTH-CARE WASTE; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DISPOSAL; ALTERNATIVES; COLLECTION; OPTIMIZATION; TOPSIS; CITY; ISTANBUL;
D O I
10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hos-pitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Multi-Criteria Framework for Sustainability Evaluation of Hydrogen-Based Multi-Microgrid Systems under Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment
    Lu, Zhiming
    Li, Youting
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [2] An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing Failures That Cause Overproduction: A Case Study in Process Manufacturing
    Sudzum, Ranka
    Nestic, Snezana
    Komatina, Nikola
    Kraisnik, Milija
    AXIOMS, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [3] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for hospitals' sustainability performance evaluation under fuzzy environment
    Regragui, Hajar
    Sefiani, Naoufal
    Azzouzi, Hamid
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (03) : 855 - 888
  • [4] AN INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MULTI-EXPERT AND MULTI-CRITERIA SYSTEM FOR EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
    Beskese, Ahmet
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Ender Buyukbay, Shirli
    Bozbura, Faik Tunc
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (06) : 2179 - 2201
  • [5] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Feyzioglu, Orhan
    Cifci, Gizem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2011, 4 (02) : 184 - 195
  • [6] Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey
    Coban, Asli
    Ertis, Irem Firtina
    Cavdaroglu, Nur Ayvaz
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 159 - 167
  • [7] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA AND MULTI-EXPERTS EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT INVESTMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE CASE OF TURKEY
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Suder, Asli
    Cebi, Selcuk
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (04) : 549 - 569
  • [8] Performance evaluation of municipal services with fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches: a case study from Turkey
    Ozdogan, Seyma
    Yildizbasi, Abdullah
    Rouyendegh, Babak Daneshvar
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (06):
  • [9] Novel Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS Approach for Sustainability Evaluation of the Bioenergy Production Process
    Mishra, Arunodaya Raj
    Rani, Pratibha
    Pandey, Kiran
    Mardani, Abbas
    Streimikis, Justas
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Alrasheedi, Melfi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [10] Multi-criteria evaluation in strategic environmental assessment for waste management plan, a case study: The city of Belgrade
    Josimovic, Bosko
    Maric, Igor
    Milijic, Sasa
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 36 : 331 - 342