Initiating or switching to IDegAsp in a real-world South African population with type 2 diabetes - a cohort analysis from the ARISE study

被引:0
作者
Kok, Adri [1 ]
Makan, Hemant [2 ]
Podgorski, Gracjan Piotr [3 ]
Joshi, Shaifali [4 ]
Chetty, Verushka [5 ]
Nojoko, Lungisa [6 ]
Bacus, Hajira [7 ]
Moosa, Naeem
Khutsoane, Duma [8 ]
机构
[1] Netcare Union Alberton Hosp, Alberton, South Africa
[2] Ctr Diabet, Lenasia, South Africa
[3] Netcare Greenacres Hosp, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[4] Diabet Care Ctr, Brooklyn, South Africa
[5] Novo Nordisk, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Prohlth & Wellness Ctr Integrat Med, PPMR Clin Trial Ctr, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[7] Lenmed Hlth Shifa Hosp, Durban, South Africa
[8] Bloemfontein Mediclin, Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
glycaemic control; IDegAsp; initiating; type; 2; diabetes; switching; INSULIN DEGLUDEC/INSULIN ASPART; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; BASAL; THERAPY; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; ADHERENCE; GLARGINE; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1080/16089677.2023.2198348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:The ARISE study was a 26-week, multicentre, prospective, open-label, non-interventional observational study to investigate clinical outcomes in people with T2D treated with IDegAsp in everyday clinical practice.Objectives:To report results from the South African cohort of the ARISE study and compare them with those from the overall population.Design:Non-interventional observational study.Setting:General and specialist private practices.Subjects:Adults >= 18 years of age with a diagnosis of T2D could be included in the study if they had been switched to, or had initiated, IDegAsp at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study.Outcome measures:The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study.Results:Data were available from 179 patients. Prior to starting IDegAsp, the majority of the patients (76%) were already being treated with insulin therapy and the mean duration of follow-up was 210 days. The most commonly reported reasons for switching to IDegAsp were to improve glycaemic control (88.8%) and reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia (39.1%). In comparison with baseline values, mean HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower at end of study (8.4% vs. 9.6%; estimated mean difference -1.3% [95% confidence interval -1.6 to -1.1, p < 0.0001]; and 7.3 vs. 10.9 mmol/L; -3.5 mmol/L [-4.5 to -2.5, p < 0.0001], respectively). Improvement in glycaemic control after the switch to IDegAsp was achieved with lower daily insulin doses and less hypoglycaemia when compared with the time period prior to switch. Two patients discontinued IDegAsp due to adverse events.Conclusion:In this South African cohort, initiating or switching to IDegAsp was associated with improved glycaemic control, lower insulin dose requirements among patients already on insulin therapy, and significantly lower rates of non-severe (overall and nocturnal) and severe hypoglycaemia in comparison with previous therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 99
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Amod A, 2017, J ENDOCRINOL METAB D, V22, DOI [DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.29645.90083, 10.13140/RG.2.2.29645.90083]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, Diabetes, V44, P1249
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, RYZOD 3 ML FLEXTOUCH
  • [4] Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Harris, Stewart B.
    Meizinger, Casey
    Skolnik, Neil S.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2018, 35 (11) : 1763 - 1774
  • [5] IDegAsp (insulin degludec
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    Home, Philip
    Kumar, Ajay
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2016, 11 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [6] Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
    Davies, Melanie J.
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    Collins, Billy S.
    Gabbay, Robert A.
    Green, Jennifer
    Maruthur, Nisa M.
    Rosas, Sylvia E.
    Del Prato, Stefano
    Mathieu, Chantal
    Mingrone, Geltrude
    Rossing, Peter
    Tankova, Tsvetalina
    Tsapas, Apostolos
    Buse, John B.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (12) : 1925 - 1966
  • [7] Twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart provides superior fasting plasma glucose control and a reduced rate of hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive adults with Type 2 diabetes
    Franek, E.
    Haluzik, M.
    Varzic, S. Canecki
    Sargin, M.
    Macura, S.
    Zacho, J.
    Christiansen, J. S.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (04) : 497 - 505
  • [8] Initiating or Switching to Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World, Prospective, Non-interventional Study Across Six Countries
    Fulcher, Gregory R.
    Akhtar, Shahid
    Al-Jaser, Saleh J.
    Medina, Johan
    Mohamed, Mafauzy
    Nicodemus, Nemencio A., Jr.
    Olsen, Anne Helene
    Singh, Kiran P.
    Kok, Adri
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (08) : 3735 - 3748
  • [9] ARISE-a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study assessing clinical parameters associated with the use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings: rationale and design
    Fulcher, Gregory R.
    Jarlov, Henrik
    Piltoft, Johanne Spanggaard
    Singh, Kiran Pal
    Liu, Lei
    Mohamed, Mafauzy
    Nicodemus, Nemencio Almare, Jr.
    Al-Jaser, Saleh Jaser
    Kok, Adri
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2021, 74 (03) : 530 - 537
  • [10] Comparison of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Uncontrolled, Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 3a, Randomized, Treat-to-Target Trial
    Fulcher, Gregory R.
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    Bantwal, Ganapathi
    Polaszewska-Muszynska, Miroslawa
    Mersebach, Henriette
    Andersen, Thomas H.
    Niskanen, Leo K.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (08) : 2084 - 2090