Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure: Deformability Index as an Adjunct to Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Increase Diagnostic Ability

被引:5
作者
Netteland, Dag Ferner [1 ,2 ]
Aarhus, Mads [1 ]
Sandset, Else Charlotte [3 ,4 ]
Padayachy, Llewellyn [5 ,6 ]
Helseth, Eirik [1 ,2 ]
Brekken, Reidar [7 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Pb 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Air Ambulance Fdn, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Pretoria, Dept Neuro Surg, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Pretoria, South Africa
[6] Steve Biko Acad Hosp, Pretoria, South Africa
[7] SINTEF, Dept Hlth Res Med Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Deformability index; Optic nerve sheath diameter; Ultrasound; Noninvasive; Intracranial pressure; Traumatic brain injury; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-01955-x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundToday, invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement remains the standard, but its invasiveness limits availability. Here, we evaluate a novel ultrasound-based optic nerve sheath parameter called the deformability index (DI) and its ability to assess ICP noninvasively. Furthermore, we ask whether combining DI with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), a more established parameter, results in increased diagnostic ability, as compared to using ONSD alone. MethodsWe prospectively included adult patients with traumatic brain injury with invasive ICP monitoring, which served as the reference measurement. Ultrasound images and videos of the optic nerve sheath were acquired. ONSD was measured at the bedside, whereas DI was calculated by semiautomated postprocessing of ultrasound videos. Correlations of ONSD and DI to ICP were explored, and a linear regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a linear regression model using ONSD alone. Ability of the noninvasive parameters to distinguish dichotomized ICP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a logistic regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a logistic regression model using ONSD alone. ResultsForty-four ultrasound examinations were performed in 26 patients. Both DI (R = - 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] R < - 0.03; p = 0.03) and ONSD (R = 0.45; 95% CI R > 0.23; p < 0.01) correlated with ICP. When including both parameters in a combined model, the estimated correlation coefficient increased (R = 0.51; 95% CI R > 0.30; p < 0.01), compared to using ONSD alone, but the model improvement did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). Both DI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.83) and ONSD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) displayed ability to distinguish ICP dichotomized at ICP >= 15 mm Hg. When using both parameters in a combined model, AUC increased (0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), and the model improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.02). ConclusionsCombining ONSD with DI holds the potential of increasing the ability of optic nerve sheath parameters in the noninvasive assessment of ICP, compared to using ONSD alone, and further study of DI is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Noninvasive and quantitative intracranial pressure estimation using ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter
    Wang, Li-juan
    Yao, Yan
    Feng, Liang-shu
    Wang, Yu-zhi
    Zheng, Nan-nan
    Feng, Jia-chun
    Xing, Ying-qi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [22] Ultrasonic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath to Detect Increased Intracranial Pressure
    Hanafi, Mohammad Ghasem
    Verki, Mohammadreza Maleki
    Parei, Sima Norouzi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2019, 27 (02) : 69 - 74
  • [23] Intracranial Pressure Assessment in Traumatic Head Injury with Hemorrhage Via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
    Vaiman, Michael
    Sigal, Tal
    Kimiagar, Itzhak
    Bekerman, Inessa
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2016, 33 (23) : 2147 - 2153
  • [24] Assessment of intracranial pressure with ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter on patients undergoing suspension direct laryngoscopy
    Elif Karali
    Abdullah Demirhan
    Akif Günes
    Isa Yildiz
    Ahmet Ural
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 1835 - 1840
  • [25] Measurement of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Detect Increased Intracranial Pressure in Hypertensive Patients
    Dikmetas, Cesareddin
    Ergin, Mehmet
    Duman, Cigdem Savas
    Gulpembe, Mustafa
    Acar, Tarik
    Yavuz, Kenan
    Cander, Basar
    Girisgin, Sadik
    Kocak, Sedat
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [26] Sonography for Determining the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter With Increasing Intracranial Pressure in a Porcine Model
    Hamilton, Douglas R.
    Sargsyan, Ashot E.
    Melton, Shannon L.
    Garcia, Kathleen M.
    Oddo, Bill
    Kwon, David S.
    Feiveson, Alan H.
    Dulchavsky, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (05) : 651 - 659
  • [27] Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter to detect increased intracranial pressure in adults: a meta-analysis
    Kim, Sung-Eun
    Hong, Eun Pyo
    Kim, Heung Cheol
    Lee, Si Un
    Jeon, Jin Pyeong
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (02) : 221 - 229
  • [28] Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as a surrogate measure for intracranial pressure in anesthetized patients in the Trendelenburg position
    Chin, Ji-Hyun
    Seo, Hyungseok
    Lee, Eun-Ho
    Lee, Joohyun
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Hwang, Jai-Hyun
    Kim, Young-Kug
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [29] Comparison of Two Techniques to Measure Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure
    Agrawal, Ashish
    Cheng, Roger
    Tang, Julin
    Madhok, Debbie Y.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (06) : E495 - E501
  • [30] THE EFFECTS OF FLUCTUATING INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE ON OPTIC NERVE SHEATH DIAMETER
    Lasseigne, Lindsay M.
    Wilson, Jason D.
    Butts, Christine
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2018, 35 (16) : A110 - A111