Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure: Deformability Index as an Adjunct to Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Increase Diagnostic Ability

被引:5
|
作者
Netteland, Dag Ferner [1 ,2 ]
Aarhus, Mads [1 ]
Sandset, Else Charlotte [3 ,4 ]
Padayachy, Llewellyn [5 ,6 ]
Helseth, Eirik [1 ,2 ]
Brekken, Reidar [7 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Pb 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Air Ambulance Fdn, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Pretoria, Dept Neuro Surg, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Pretoria, South Africa
[6] Steve Biko Acad Hosp, Pretoria, South Africa
[7] SINTEF, Dept Hlth Res Med Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Deformability index; Optic nerve sheath diameter; Ultrasound; Noninvasive; Intracranial pressure; Traumatic brain injury; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-01955-x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundToday, invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement remains the standard, but its invasiveness limits availability. Here, we evaluate a novel ultrasound-based optic nerve sheath parameter called the deformability index (DI) and its ability to assess ICP noninvasively. Furthermore, we ask whether combining DI with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), a more established parameter, results in increased diagnostic ability, as compared to using ONSD alone. MethodsWe prospectively included adult patients with traumatic brain injury with invasive ICP monitoring, which served as the reference measurement. Ultrasound images and videos of the optic nerve sheath were acquired. ONSD was measured at the bedside, whereas DI was calculated by semiautomated postprocessing of ultrasound videos. Correlations of ONSD and DI to ICP were explored, and a linear regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a linear regression model using ONSD alone. Ability of the noninvasive parameters to distinguish dichotomized ICP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a logistic regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a logistic regression model using ONSD alone. ResultsForty-four ultrasound examinations were performed in 26 patients. Both DI (R = - 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] R < - 0.03; p = 0.03) and ONSD (R = 0.45; 95% CI R > 0.23; p < 0.01) correlated with ICP. When including both parameters in a combined model, the estimated correlation coefficient increased (R = 0.51; 95% CI R > 0.30; p < 0.01), compared to using ONSD alone, but the model improvement did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). Both DI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.83) and ONSD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) displayed ability to distinguish ICP dichotomized at ICP >= 15 mm Hg. When using both parameters in a combined model, AUC increased (0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), and the model improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.02). ConclusionsCombining ONSD with DI holds the potential of increasing the ability of optic nerve sheath parameters in the noninvasive assessment of ICP, compared to using ONSD alone, and further study of DI is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Noninvasive Transorbital Assessment of the Optic Nerve Sheath in Children: Relationship Between Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter, Deformability Index, and Intracranial Pressure
    Padayachy, Llewellyn
    Brekken, Reidar
    Fieggen, Graham
    Selbekk, Tormod
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 16 (06) : 726 - 733
  • [2] Assessment of intracranial pressure with ultrasonographic retrobulbar optic nerve sheath diameter measurement
    Liu, Dachuan
    Li, Zhen
    Zhang, Xuxiang
    Zhao, Liping
    Jia, Jianping
    Sun, Fei
    Wang, Yaxing
    Ma, Daqing
    Wei, Wenbin
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [3] Noninvasive intracranial pressure assessment by optic nerve sheath diameter: Automated measurements as an alternative to clinician-performed measurements
    Netteland, Dag Ferner
    Aarhus, Mads
    Smistad, Erik
    Sandset, Else Charlotte
    Padayachy, Llewellyn
    Helseth, Eirik
    Brekken, Reidar
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [4] Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Assessment in Patients with Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Kavi, Tapan
    Gupta, Anuj
    Hunter, Krystal
    Schreiber, Craig
    Shaikh, Hamza
    Turtz, Alan R.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [5] Sonographic Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter as an Estimate of Intracranial Pressure in Adult Trauma
    Strumwasser, Aaron
    Kwan, Rita O.
    Yeung, Louise
    Miraflor, Emily
    Ereso, Alex
    Castro-Moure, Frederico
    Patel, Atul
    Sadjadi, Javid
    Victorino, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 170 (02) : 265 - 271
  • [6] Optic nerve sheath diameter does not correlate with intracranial pressure in pediatric neurocritical care patients
    Biggs, Austin
    Lovett, Marlina
    Moore-Clingenpeel, Melissa
    O'Brien, Nicole
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2021, 37 (03) : 951 - 957
  • [7] Real-Time Automated Measurements of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter for Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Netteland, Dag Ferner
    Aarhus, Mads
    Sandset, Else Charlotte
    Sorteberg, Angelika
    Padayachy, Llewellyn
    Helseth, Eirik
    Brekken, Reidar
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2025, : 1043 - 1053
  • [8] The diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter and color Doppler indices of the ophthalmic arteries in detecting elevated intracranial pressure
    Tarzamni, Mohammad Kazem
    Derakhshan, Babak
    Meshkini, Ali
    Merat, Hamid
    Fouladi, Daniel Fadaei
    Mostafazadeh, Samira
    Rezakhah, Amir
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 141 : 82 - 88
  • [9] Correlation of optic nerve and optic nerve sheath diameter with intracranial pressure in pigs
    Mija, R.
    Zubak, I
    Schuetz, A.
    Glas, M.
    Fung, C.
    Jakob, S. M.
    Beck, J.
    Z'Graggen, W. J.
    Bloch, Andreas
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [10] Assessment of intracranial pressure with ultrasonographic retrobulbar optic nerve sheath diameter measurement
    Dachuan Liu
    Zhen Li
    Xuxiang Zhang
    Liping Zhao
    Jianping Jia
    Fei Sun
    Yaxing Wang
    Daqing Ma
    Wenbin Wei
    BMC Neurology, 17