Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership

被引:0
作者
Dawson, Chris [1 ]
Baker, Paul L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 11期
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; FAKE NEWS; BREXIT; ATTITUDES; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; MISINFORMATION; IMMIGRATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0289312
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
On June 23rd 2016 the UK voted to leave the European Union. The period leading up to the referendum was characterized by a significant volume of misinformation and disinformation. Existing literature has established the importance of cognitive ability in processing and discounting (mis/dis) information in decision making. We use a dataset of couples within households from a nationally representative UK survey to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and the propensity to vote Leave / Remain in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership. We find that a one standard deviation increase in cognitive ability, all else being equal, increases the likelihood of a Remain vote by 9.7%. Similarly, we find that an increase in partner's cognitive ability further increases the respondent's likelihood of a Remain vote (7.6%). In a final test, restricting our analysis to couples who voted in a conflicting manner, we find that having a cognitive ability advantage over one's partner increases the likelihood of voting Remain (10.9%). An important question then becomes how to improve individual and household decision making in the face of increasing amounts of (mis/dis) information.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Disentangling the Brexit vote: The role of economic, social and cultural contexts in explaining the UK's EU referendum vote
    Abreu, Maria
    Oner, Ozge
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2020, 52 (07): : 1434 - 1456
  • [2] Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined
    Alabrese, Eleonora
    Becker, Sascha O.
    Fetzer, Thiemo
    Novy, Dennis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 56 : 132 - 150
  • [3] Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
    Allcott, Hunt
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) : 211 - 235
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Statista.com
  • [5] On the causes of Brexit
    Arnorsson, Agust
    Zoega, Gylfi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 55 : 301 - 323
  • [6] Asthana Anushka., 2016, The Guardian
  • [7] Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions
    Bakker, Bert N.
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2016, 17 (01) : 25 - 45
  • [8] Knowing More from Less: How the Information Environment Increases Knowledge of Party Positions
    Banducci, Susan
    Giebler, Heiko
    Kritzinger, Sylvia
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 47 (03) : 571 - 588
  • [9] Cognitive Impairment and the Right to Vote: A Strategic Approach
    Barclay, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 30 (02) : 146 - 159
  • [10] Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study
    Batty, G. David
    Deary, Ian J.
    Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Altschul, Drew
    [J]. BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2021, 96 : 100 - 105