Dependence as strategy: extending resource dependence theory and clarifying its understanding of the strategic options of dependent firms

被引:8
作者
Coskun, Recai [1 ]
Ozturk, Oguzhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Dept Int Trade & Business, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Strategic management; Strategy; Dependence; Resource dependence theory; Asymmetric dependence; BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS; CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS; EMERGING MARKET FIRMS; MUTUAL DEPENDENCE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; POWER-DEPENDENCE; JOINT VENTURES; INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES; ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE;
D O I
10.1108/IJOA-07-2023-3886
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate resource dependence theory's (RDT) assumptions and explanations about dependence and the dependent firm's strategic options. The authors argue that RDT's perception of dependence is problematic because it evaluates dependence as a purely negative situation in which all firms, by definition, seek to develop strategies to change the power structure of such relationships. On the contrary, the authors argue that there are situations in which dependent firms are in agreement with dependence and, therefore, develop strategies that do not aim to change the balance of power in the relationship, but rather to strengthen their position within the relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe research is designed as a theoretical discussion. The authors critically evaluate and discuss current understanding and assumptions about RDT's dependence explanations. Drawing on insights from the strategic management literature, the authors offer a new perspective on the problematic areas in the dependence explanations of the RDT.FindingsDrawing on insights from the strategic management literature, the authors argue that dependent firms enjoy certain advantages due to the dependence relationship to gain sustainable competitive advantages over their rivals and potential competitors. These advantages include factors such as increasing growth potential, developing capabilities and competencies, building relationships of trust with powerful firms and leveraging their reputations and references that contribute to the sustainable strategic advantages of dependent firms. The authors believe that this study has the potential to spur new research that further challenges the assumptions of the RDT and empirically tests its propositions.Originality/valueThe authors propose a research framework on dependence as a strategic option that has the possibility of expanding RDT's current dependence explanation.
引用
收藏
页码:1982 / 2009
页数:28
相关论文
共 254 条
[91]   The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Cannella, AA ;
Paetzold, RL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (02) :235-255
[92]   Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Dalziel, T .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :383-396
[93]   Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? [J].
Hillman, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (03) :464-481
[94]  
Hillman AJ, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P67, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<67::AID-SMJ22>3.3.CO
[95]  
2-K
[96]  
Hillman AJ, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P941
[97]   Resource Dependence Theory: A Review [J].
Hillman, Amy J. ;
Withers, Michael C. ;
Collins, Brian J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2009, 35 (06) :1404-1427
[98]   Power imbalanced relationships: cases from UK fresh food supply [J].
Hingley, Martin K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 33 (08) :551-+
[99]   Power to all our friends? Living with imbalance in supplier-retailer relationships [J].
Hingley, MK .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2005, 34 (08) :848-858
[100]  
Hiziroglu M., 2020, Strateji Arastirmalarinin Kuramsal Temelleri (Theoretical Foundations of Strategy Research)