Prediction of a Multi-Gene Assay (Oncotype DX and Mammaprint) Recurrence Risk Group Using Machine Learning in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer-The BRAIN Study

被引:7
作者
Ji, Jung-Hwan [1 ]
Ahn, Sung Gwe [2 ]
Yoo, Youngbum [3 ]
Park, Shin-Young [4 ]
Kim, Joo-Heung [5 ]
Jeong, Ji-Yeong [6 ]
Park, Seho [7 ]
Lee, Ilkyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Kwandong Univ, Int St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Incheon 22711, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul 06273, South Korea
[3] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 120-1 Neungdong Ro, Seoul 05030, South Korea
[4] Inha Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Incheon 22332, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Yongin 16995, South Korea
[6] Dept AI Res, Neurodigm, Seoul 04790, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Breast Surg, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
breast cancer; multi-gene assay; machine learning; prediction model; EARLY-STAGE; TREATMENT DECISIONS; SCORE ASSAY; SIGNATURES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16040774
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Multi-gene assays (MGAs), such as Oncotype DX and Mammaprint, are used to provide predictive and prognostic values in treatment of ER+HER2- breast cancer. However, their accessibility is restricted due to their high cost in some countries. For this reason, many studies have been conducted to develop the tests that can replace the multi-gene assays, but practicality is still insufficient. The aim of our study is to develop a highly accessible machine learning-based model for predicting the result of MGA. Our accurate and affordable machine learning-based predictive model may serve as a cost-effective alternative to the expensive multi-gene assays. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for predicting multi-gene assay (MGA) risk categories. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- breast cancer who had undergone Oncotype DX (ODX) or MammaPrint (MMP) were used to develop the prediction model. The development cohort consisted of a total of 2565 patients including 2039 patients tested with ODX and 526 patients tested with MMP. The MMP risk prediction model utilized a single XGBoost model, and the ODX risk prediction model utilized combined LightGBM, CatBoost, and XGBoost models through soft voting. Additionally, the ensemble (MMP + ODX) model combining MMP and ODX utilized CatBoost and XGBoost through soft voting. Ten random samples, corresponding to 10% of the modeling dataset, were extracted, and cross-validation was performed to evaluate the accuracy on each validation set. The accuracy of our predictive models was 84.8% for MMP, 87.9% for ODX, and 86.8% for the ensemble model. In the ensemble cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, and precision for predicting the low-risk category were 0.91, 0.66, and 0.92, respectively. The prediction accuracy exceeded 90% in several subgroups, with the highest prediction accuracy of 95.7% in the subgroup that met Ki-67 <20 and HG 1 similar to 2 and premenopausal status. Our machine learning-based predictive model has the potential to complement existing MGAs in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update-Integration of Results From TAILORx [J].
Andre, Fabrice ;
Ismaila, Nofisat ;
Henry, N. Lynn ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Bast, Robert C. ;
Barlow, William ;
Collyar, Deborah E. ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth ;
Kuderer, Nicole M. ;
Liu, Minetta C. ;
Van Poznak, Catherine ;
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Stearns, Vered .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (22) :1956-+
[2]   Prediction of Oncotype DX recurrence score using deep multi-layer perceptrons in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer [J].
Baltres, Aline ;
Al Masry, Zeina ;
Zemouri, Ryad ;
Valmary-Degano, Severine ;
Arnould, Laurent ;
Zerhouni, Noureddine ;
Devalland, Christine .
BREAST CANCER, 2020, 27 (05) :1007-1016
[3]   70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Cardoso, F. ;
van't Veer, L. J. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Slaets, L. ;
Viale, G. ;
Delaloge, S. ;
Pierga, J. -Y. ;
Brain, E. ;
Causeret, S. ;
DeLorenzi, M. ;
Glas, A. M. ;
Golfinopoulos, V. ;
Goulioti, T. ;
Knox, S. ;
Matos, E. ;
Meulemans, B. ;
Neijenhuis, P. A. ;
Nitz, U. ;
Passalacqua, R. ;
Ravdin, P. ;
Rubio, I. T. ;
Saghatchian, M. ;
Smilde, T. J. ;
Sotiriou, C. ;
Stork, L. ;
Straehle, C. ;
Thomas, G. ;
Thompson, A. M. ;
van der Hoeven, J. M. ;
Vuylsteke, P. ;
Bernards, R. ;
Tryfonidis, K. ;
Rutgers, E. ;
Piccart, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (08) :717-729
[4]  
Cognetti Francesco, 2021, Oncotarget, V12, P936, DOI [10.18632/oncotarget.27948, 10.18632/oncotarget.27948]
[5]   Breast Cancer-Major Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual [J].
Giuliano, Armando E. ;
Connolly, James L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. ;
Rugo, Hope S. ;
Solin, Lawrence J. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Winchester, David J. ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (04) :291-303
[6]   Utilization of Oncotype DX in an Inner City Population: Race or Place? [J].
Guth, Amber A. ;
Fineberg, Susan ;
Fei, Kezhen ;
Franco, Rebeca ;
Bickell, Nina A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2013, 2013
[7]   3 Multigene prognostic tests in breast cancer: past, present, future [J].
Gyorffy, Balazs ;
Hatzis, Christos ;
Sanft, Tara ;
Hofstatter, Erin ;
Aktas, Bilge ;
Pusztai, Lajos .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
[8]   Economic Evaluation of Genomic Test-Directed Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer [J].
Hall, Peter S. ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Stein, Robert C. ;
Cameron, David .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (01) :56-66
[9]   Algorithms for prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using clinicopathologic data: a review and comparison using an independent dataset [J].
Harowicz, Michael R. ;
Robinson, Timothy J. ;
Dinan, Michaela A. ;
Saha, Ashirbani ;
Marks, Jeffrey R. ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Mazurowski, Maciej A. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (01) :1-10
[10]   Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline Recommendations [J].
Henry, N. Lynn ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Abramson, Vandana G. ;
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Anders, Carey K. ;
Chingos, Diana T. ;
Hurria, Arti ;
Openshaw, Thomas H. ;
Krop, Ian E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (19) :2303-+