Sustainable agriculture and GM crops: the case of Bt cotton impact in Ballari district of India

被引:3
作者
Subramanian, Arjunan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Econ, Glasgow, Scotland
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
sustainable agriculture; Bt cotton; pest pressure; genetically modified crops; India; PINK-BOLLWORM; BIOTECHNOLOGY; RESISTANCE; HOUSEHOLDS; FARMERS; STATE; CHINA;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2023.1102395
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton are at the forefront of an intense debate on the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops among smallholder farmers in developing countries. Existing studies fail to control for confounders, selection bias, or cultivation bias from preferential treatment in the initial adoption phase. Addressing these concerns in this paper, I examine the impact of Bt cotton employing an unbalanced panel fixed-effects model of a crop yield and profit function on newly collected plot-level data in the most recent decade. Results show that Bt cotton yields have stagnated, have a null effect on profits, and have become more sensitive to pest pressure in the most recent decade. Though many studies have demonstrated higher crop yield and profit gains in the first decade of Bt cotton adoption that raised the average returns to the technology, the second decade shows convergence in benefits, which raises obvious questions about the prospect of GM technology. Since Bt cotton is the only GM crop technology widely adopted by smallholder farmers, the findings of this paper contribute to the broader public debate on the future of agricultural biotechnology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems
    Abdul Aziz, Mughair
    Brini, Faical
    Rouached, Hatem
    Masmoudi, Khaled
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [2] Bt Cotton, Pesticide Use and Environmental Efficiency in Pakistan
    Abedullah
    Kouser, Shahzad
    Qaim, Matin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (01) : 66 - 86
  • [3] Bakhsh K, 2017, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V22, P373, DOI [10.1017/S1355770X17000080, 10.1017/s1355770x17000080]
  • [4] Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops
    Barrows, Geoffrey
    Sexton, Steven
    Zilberman, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (01) : 99 - 119
  • [5] Blaise D, 2020, COTTON PRODUCTION, P193
  • [6] The state of the 'GMO' debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech?
    Evanega, Sarah
    Conrow, Joan
    Adams, Jordan
    Lynas, Mark
    [J]. GM CROPS & FOOD-BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE AND THE FOOD CHAIN, 2022, 13 (01): : 38 - 49
  • [7] Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
    Godfray, H. Charles J.
    Beddington, John R.
    Crute, Ian R.
    Haddad, Lawrence
    Lawrence, David
    Muir, James F.
    Pretty, Jules
    Robinson, Sherman
    Thomas, Sandy M.
    Toulmin, Camilla
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5967) : 812 - 818
  • [8] Government of India, 2017, Status paper of Indian cotton
  • [9] Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides
    Gutierrez, Andrew Paul
    Ponti, Luigi
    Kranthi, Keshav R.
    Baumgartner, Johann
    Kenmore, Peter E.
    Gilioli, Gianni
    Boggia, Antonio
    Cure, Jose Ricardo
    Rodriguez, Daniel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [10] Gutierrez AP, 2019, CURR SCI INDIA, V117, P1422