Government innovation subsidy, executives' academic capital and innovation quality: Evidence from pharmaceutical companies in China

被引:5
作者
Xia, Yuntian [1 ]
Fan, Min [1 ]
Zuo, Xu [2 ]
Hao, Wenjing [1 ]
Jia, Yiwen [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei First Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
CEO's academic capital; patents; quality; innovation; subsidy; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; MODERATING ROLE; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1092162
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The government employs innovation subsidies as a key incentive strategy to promote companies to innovate more technically. This study analyses how innovation subsidies influences the quality of corporate innovation. We create an innovation quality index for pharmaceutical corporations using categorizing data from patent applications submitted by pharmaceutical companies. Using data from 180 listed Chinese pharmaceutical companies between 2010 and 2020, this study proposes a panel regression model to assess the influence of government innovation subsidies on innovation quality, as well as the moderating effect of CEOs' academic capital. How well innovations are subsidized is also affected by the heterogeneity of property rights. Innovation subsidy has a greater and more positive impact on non-SOEs. This article demonstrates that CEOs with academic credentials and executives with ties to the pharmaceutical industry have a variety of moderate effects. The research offers novel suggestions for enhancing business creativity and the innovation subsidy programme.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 119 条
[31]   The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance [J].
Dyreng, Scott D. ;
Hanlon, Michelle ;
Maydew, Edward L. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2010, 85 (04) :1163-1189
[32]   Public procurement and innovation - Resurrecting the demand side [J].
Edler, Jakob ;
Georghiou, Luke .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (07) :949-963
[33]   Regional Innovation Measured by Patent Data-Does Quality Matter? [J].
Ejermo, Olof .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2009, 16 (02) :141-165
[34]   The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers:: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior [J].
Feldman, Maryann P. ;
Kelley, Maryellen R. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (10) :1509-1521
[35]   The effect of developing countries' innovation policies on firms' decisions to invest in R&D [J].
Fernandez-Sastre, Juan ;
Montalvo-Quizhpi, Fernando .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 143 :214-223
[36]   TOP-MANAGEMENT-TEAM TENURE AND ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES - THE MODERATING ROLE OF MANAGERIAL DISCRETION [J].
FINKELSTEIN, S ;
HAMBRICK, DC .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (03) :484-503
[37]  
Fischer P, 2007, RENTSEEKING I REFORM
[38]   Can public R&D subsidy facilitate firms? exploratory innovation? The heterogeneous effects between central and local subsidy programs [J].
Gao, Yuchen ;
Hu, Yimei ;
Liu, Xielin ;
Zhang, Huanren .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (04)
[39]   Identifying and ranking appropriate strategies for effective technology transfer in the automotive industry: Evidence from Iran [J].
Halili, Zahra .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 62
[40]  
Hall B.H., 2005, BLACKWELL HDB TECHNO