Government innovation subsidy, executives' academic capital and innovation quality: Evidence from pharmaceutical companies in China

被引:5
作者
Xia, Yuntian [1 ]
Fan, Min [1 ]
Zuo, Xu [2 ]
Hao, Wenjing [1 ]
Jia, Yiwen [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei First Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
CEO's academic capital; patents; quality; innovation; subsidy; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; MODERATING ROLE; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1092162
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The government employs innovation subsidies as a key incentive strategy to promote companies to innovate more technically. This study analyses how innovation subsidies influences the quality of corporate innovation. We create an innovation quality index for pharmaceutical corporations using categorizing data from patent applications submitted by pharmaceutical companies. Using data from 180 listed Chinese pharmaceutical companies between 2010 and 2020, this study proposes a panel regression model to assess the influence of government innovation subsidies on innovation quality, as well as the moderating effect of CEOs' academic capital. How well innovations are subsidized is also affected by the heterogeneity of property rights. Innovation subsidy has a greater and more positive impact on non-SOEs. This article demonstrates that CEOs with academic credentials and executives with ties to the pharmaceutical industry have a variety of moderate effects. The research offers novel suggestions for enhancing business creativity and the innovation subsidy programme.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   Innovation and Top Income Inequality [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Bergeaud, Antonin ;
Blundell, Richard ;
Hemous, David .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :1-45
[2]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[3]   Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnology [J].
Aghmiuni, Samira Khodi ;
Siyal, Saeed ;
Wang, Qiang ;
Duan, Yuzhen .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, 5 (03) :179-189
[4]   Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms? [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Lee, Weonvin ;
Mortara, Letizia .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
[5]   Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors [J].
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Baslandze, Salome ;
Stantcheva, Stefanie .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (10) :2930-2981
[6]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[7]   Persistence in R&D Performance and its Implications for the Granting of Subsidies [J].
Arque-Castells, Pere .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2013, 43 (03) :193-220
[8]   Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures [J].
Arts, Sam ;
Hou, Jianan ;
Gomez, Juan Carlos .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (02)
[9]  
Babapour J, 2018, IRAN J PHARM RES, V17, P224
[10]   The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Song, Siyi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Ranran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) :819-829