Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness

被引:8
作者
Ovalle, Anaelia [1 ]
Subramonian, Arjun [1 ]
Gautam, Vagrant [2 ]
Gee, Gilbert [3 ]
Chang, Kai-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Saarland Univ, Spoken Language Syst, Saarbrucken, Germany
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Community Hlth, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2023 | 2023年
关键词
fairness; intersectionality; artificial intelligence; literature review;
D O I
10.1145/3600211.3604705
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Intersectionality is a critical framework that, through inquiry and praxis, allows us to examine how social inequalities persist through domains of structure and discipline. Given AI fairness' raison d'etre of "fairness," we argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness. Through a critical review of how intersectionality is discussed in 30 papers from the AI fairness literature, we deductively and inductively: 1) map how intersectionality tenets operate within the AI fairness paradigm and 2) uncover gaps between the conceptualization and operationalization of intersectionality. We find that researchers overwhelmingly reduce intersectionality to optimizing for fairness metrics over demographic subgroups. They also fail to discuss their social context and when mentioning power, they mostly situate it only within the AI pipeline. We: 3) outline and assess the implications of these gaps for critical inquiry and praxis, and 4) provide actionable recommendations for AI fairness researchers to engage with intersectionality in their work by grounding it in AI epistemology.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 511
页数:16
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Alexander-Floyd NG., 2012, Feminist Formations, V24, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], Understanding Pragmatic Research: Two Traditional Research Paradigms
  • [3] Barocas S., 2019, FAIRNESS MACHINE LEA
  • [4] Big Data's Disparate Impact
    Barocas, Solon
    Selbst, Andrew D.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2016, 104 (03) : 671 - 732
  • [5] Latent variable and clustering methods in intersectionality research: systematic review of methods applications
    Bauer, Greta R.
    Mahendran, Mayuri
    Walwyn, Chantel
    Shokoohi, Mostafa
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 57 (02) : 221 - 237
  • [6] Berger MT, 2009, INTERSECTIONAL APPROACH: TRANSFORMING THE ACADEMY THROUGH RACE, CLASS, AND GENDER, P1
  • [7] INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies
    Bilge, Sirma
    [J]. DU BOIS REVIEW-SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON RACE, 2013, 10 (02) : 405 - 424
  • [8] On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairness
    Binns, Reuben
    [J]. FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, : 514 - 524
  • [9] Birhane Abeba, 2022, FAccT '22: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, P948, DOI 10.1145/3531146.3533157
  • [10] Birhane A, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2009.14258