Towards BIM-Based Sustainable Structural Design Optimization: A Systematic Review and Industry Perspective

被引:16
作者
Afzal, Muhammad [1 ]
Li, Rita Yi Man [2 ]
Ayyub, Muhammad Faisal [3 ]
Shoaib, Muhammad [1 ]
Bilal, Muhammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture Built Environm & Construct Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Hong Kong Shue Yan Univ, Sustainable Real Estate Res Ctr, Dept Econ & Finance, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn DICAM, Alma Mater Studiorum, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[4] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
automated structural design; building information modeling (BIM); design automation; generative design; interoperability; structural design optimization (SDO); systematic framework; REINFORCED-CONCRETE COLUMNS; CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKING; DIGITAL FABRICATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMBODIED ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/su152015117
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Structural design optimization (SDO) plays a pivotal role in enhancing various aspects of construction projects, including design quality, cost efficiency, safety, and structural reliability. Recent endeavors in academia and industry have sought to harness the potential of building information modeling (BIM) and optimization algorithms to optimize SDO and improve design outcomes. This review paper aims to synthesize these efforts, shedding light on how SDO contributes to project coordination. Furthermore, the integration of sustainability considerations and the application of innovative technologies and optimization algorithms in SDO necessitate more interactive early stage collaboration among project stakeholders. This study offers a comprehensive exploration of contemporary research in integrated SDO employing BIM and optimization algorithms. It commences with an exploratory investigation, employing both qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques following the PRISMA systematic review methodology. Subsequently, an open-ended opinion survey was conducted among construction industry professionals in Europe. This survey yields valuable insights into the coordination challenges and potential solutions arising from technological shifts and interoperability concerns associated with the widespread implementation of SDO. These preliminary steps of systematic review and industry survey furnish a robust foundation of knowledge, enabling the proposal of an intelligent framework for automating early stage sustainable structural design optimization (ESSDO) within the construction sector. The ESSDO framework addresses the challenges of fragmented collaboration between architects and structural engineers. This proposed framework seamlessly integrates with the BIM platform, i.e., Autodesk Revit for architects. It extracts crucial architectural data and transfers it to the structural design and analysis platform, i.e., Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis (RSA), for structural engineers via the visual programming tool Dynamo. Once the optimization occurs, optimal outcomes are visualized within BIM environments. This visualization elevates interactive collaborations between architects and engineers, facilitating automation throughout the workflow and smoother information exchange.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [31] Automatic generation of fabrication drawings for facade mullions and transoms through BIM models
    Deng, Min
    Gan, Vincent J. L.
    Tan, Yi
    Joneja, Ajay
    Cheng, Jack C. P.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2019, 42
  • [32] 'The problem-centred expert interview'. Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge
    Doeringer, Stefanie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 24 (03) : 265 - 278
  • [33] Good early stage design decisions can halve embodied CO2 and lower structural frames' cost
    Dunant, Cyrille F.
    Drewniok, Michal P.
    Orr, John J.
    Allwood, Julian M.
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2021, 33 : 343 - 354
  • [34] Eastman C., 2008, BIM HDB GUIDE BUILDI, DOI [10.1002/9780470261309, DOI 10.1002/9780470261309]
  • [35] BIM-embedded life cycle carbon assessment of RC buildings using optimised structural design alternatives
    Eleftheriadis, S.
    Duffour, P.
    Mumovic, D.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 173 : 587 - 600
  • [36] Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities
    Eleftheriadis, Stathis
    Mumovic, Dejan
    Greening, Paul
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 811 - 825
  • [37] Approaches for BIM-based multi-objective optimization in construction scheduling
    Essam, Noha
    Khodeir, Laila
    Fathy, Fatma
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (06)
  • [38] Semi-supervised learning method incorporating structural optimization for shear-wall structure design using small and long-tailed datasets
    Fei, Yifan
    Liao, Wenjie
    Lu, Xinzheng
    Taciroglu, Ertugrul
    Guan, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 79
  • [39] Fink A., 2019, CONDUCTING RES LIT R
  • [40] An overview to structural seismic design optimisation frameworks
    Fragiadakis, Michalis
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2011, 89 (11-12) : 1155 - 1165