Evaluation of therapeutic radiographer contouring for magnetic resonance image guided online adaptive prostate radiotherapy

被引:21
作者
Smith, Gillian Adair [1 ,6 ]
Dunlop, Alex [3 ,4 ]
Alexander, Sophie E. [2 ]
Barnes, Helen [1 ]
Casey, Francis [3 ,4 ]
Chick, Joan [3 ,4 ]
Gunapala, Ranga [5 ]
Herbert, Trina [1 ]
Lawes, Rebekah [1 ]
Mason, Sarah A. [3 ,4 ]
Mitchell, Adam [3 ,4 ]
Mohajer, Jonathan [3 ,4 ]
Murray, Julia [2 ]
Nill, Simeon [3 ,4 ]
Patel, Priyanka [2 ]
Pathmanathan, Angela [2 ]
Sritharan, Kobika [2 ]
Sundahl, Nora [2 ]
Tree, Alison C. [2 ]
Westley, Rosalyne [2 ]
Williams, Bethany [1 ]
McNair, Helen A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Canc Res, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden, Joint Dept Phys, London, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Clin Trials & Stat Unit, London, England
[6] Royal Marsden, Radiotherapy, Downs Rd, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Prostate radiotherapy; MR-Linac; Radiographer contouring; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; MRI; CT; DELINEATION; DEFINITION; VOLUMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109457
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The implementation of MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy has facilitated the extension of therapeutic radiographers' roles to include contouring, thus releasing the clinician from attending daily treatment. Following undergoing a specifically designed training programme, an online interobserver variability study was performed. Materials and Methods: 117 images from six patients treated on a MR Linac were contoured online by either radiographer or clinician and the same images contoured offline by the alternate profession. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), Hausdorff distance (HD) and volume metrics were used to analyse contours. Additionally, the online radiographer contours and optimised plans (n = 59) were analysed using the offline clinician defined contours. After clinical implementation of radiographer contouring, target volume comparison and dose analysis was performed on 20 contours from five patients. Results: Comparison of the radiographers' and clinicians' contours resulted in a median (range) DSC of 0.92 (0.86 - 0.99), median (range) MDA of 0.98 mm (0.2-1.7) and median (range) HD of 6.3 mm (2.5- 11.5) for all 117 fractions. There was no significant difference in volume size between the two groups. Of the 59 plans created with radiographer online contours and overlaid with clinicians' offline contours, 39 met mandatory dose constraints and 12 were acceptable because 95 % of the high dose PTV was covered by 95 % dose, or the high dose PTV was within 3 % of online plan. A clinician blindly reviewed the eight remaining fractions and, using trial quality assurance metrics, deemed all to be acceptable. Following clinical implementation of radiographer contouring, the median (range) DSC of CTV was 0.93 (0.88-1.0), median (range) MDA was 0.8 mm (0.04-1.18) and HD was 5.15 mm (2.09-8.54) respectively. Of the 20 plans created using radiographer online contours overlaid with clinicians' offline contours, 18 met the dosimetric success criteria, the remaining 2 were deemed acceptable by a clinician. Conclusion: Radiographer and clinician prostate and seminal vesicle contours on MRI for an online adaptive workflow are comparable and produce clinically acceptable plans. Radiographer contouring for prostate treatment on a MR-linac can be effectively introduced with appropriate training and evaluation. A DSC threshold for target structures could be implemented to streamline future training. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 180 (2023) 1-10 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Prostate Volume Changes during Extreme and Moderately Hypofractionated Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Radiotherapy [J].
Alexander, S. E. ;
McNair, H. A. ;
Oelfke, U. ;
Huddart, R. ;
Murray, J. ;
Pathmanathan, A. ;
Patel, P. ;
Sritharan, K. ;
van As, N. ;
Tree, A. C. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (09) :E383-E391
[2]  
Barghi A, 2013, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, P5
[3]  
Barnes Helen, 2020, Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol, V13, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.01.001
[4]   ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology [J].
Corradini, Stefanie ;
Alongi, Filippo ;
Andratschke, Nicolaus ;
Azria, David ;
Bohoudi, Omar ;
Boldrini, Luca ;
Bruynzeel, Anna ;
Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane ;
Juergenliemk-Schulz, Ina ;
Lagerwaard, Frank ;
McNair, Helen ;
Raaymakers, Bas ;
Schytte, Tine ;
Tree, Alison ;
Valentini, Vincenzo ;
Wilke, Lotte ;
Zips, Daniel ;
Belka, Claus .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 :146-154
[5]   Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy [J].
Dubois, DF ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Hotchkiss, LA ;
Prete, JJ ;
Bice, WS .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :785-789
[6]   Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: Initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac [J].
Dunlop, Alex ;
Mitchell, Adam ;
Tree, Alison ;
Barnes, Helen ;
Bower, Lorna ;
Chick, Joan ;
Goodwin, Edmund ;
Herbert, Trina ;
Lawes, Rebekah ;
McNair, Helen ;
McQuaid, Dualta ;
Mohajer, Jonathan ;
Nilawar, Rahul ;
Pathmanathan, Angela ;
Smith, Gillian ;
Hanson, Ian ;
Nill, Simeon ;
Oelfke, Uwe .
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 23 :35-42
[7]   Prostate cancer GTV delineation with biparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET: comparison of expert contours and semi-automated methods [J].
Hearn, Nathan ;
Blazak, John ;
Vivian, Philip ;
Vignarajah, Dinesh ;
Cahill, Katelyn ;
Atwell, Daisy ;
Lagopoulos, Jim ;
Min, Myo .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1119)
[8]   Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience [J].
Henke, L. E. ;
Contreras, J. A. ;
Green, O. L. ;
Cai, B. ;
Kim, H. ;
Roach, M. C. ;
Olsen, J. R. ;
Fischer-Valuck, B. ;
Mullen, D. F. ;
Kashani, R. ;
Thomas, M. A. ;
Huang, J. ;
Zoberi, I ;
Yang, D. ;
Rodrigue, V ;
Bradley, J. D. ;
Robinson, C. G. ;
Parikh, P. ;
Mutic, S. ;
Michalski, J. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 (11) :720-727
[9]   Are therapeutic radiographers able to achieve clinically acceptable verification for stereotactic lung radiotherapy treatment (SBRT)? [J].
Hudson, J. ;
Doolan, C. ;
McDonald, F. ;
Locke, I. ;
Ahmed, M. ;
Gunapala, G. ;
McNair, H. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2015, 14 (01) :10-17
[10]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, ICRU50