Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity and construction of ecological security pattern in West Liaohe River Basin of China

被引:2
|
作者
Zheng, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jianying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Yinshanbeilu Grassland Ecohydrol Natl Observat & R, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Dept Water Resources Pastoral Areas, Hohhot, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
ecological carrying capacity; spatiotemporal evolution; ecological security pattern; ecological restoration; West Liaohe River Basin; VEGETATION RESTORATION; SOIL-MOISTURE; LOESS PLATEAU; ECOSYSTEM; AREAS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2024.1335671
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The West Liaohe River Basin (WRLB) is a typical agro-pastoral interlaced zone in Northeast China where excessive economic development activities brought great pressure on the ecosystem and caused a series of ecological problems, having a negative effect on regional ecological carrying capacity (ECC). The rational construction of ecological security pattern (ESP) is an effective way to improve regional ECC and alleviate the contradiction between ecological protection and economic development. In this study, taking the WLRB as an example, spatiotemporal changes of ECC in the WLRB from 2000 to 2020 were explored by using spatial principal component analysis (SPCA). Furthermore, ecological sources were determined by coupling ECC evaluation results with important ecological patches such as natural protected areas, and the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model combined with the circuit theory method were employed to identify ecological security zoning, ecological corridors and key ecological nodes. Then a comprehensive ESP of the basin was constructed. The results show as follows: 1) The ECC of the overall WLRB was at medium carrying level, yet was spatially differentiated, which decreased from the periphery to the center of the basin in general. ECC showed a fluctuating upward trend from 2000 to 2020. 2) The ecological source area of the WLRB was 21926.91 km(2), accounting for 17.33% of the total study area. The ecological sources were seriously fragmentated and mainly distributed in the mountain area. The area of ecological conservation zone, optimized buffer zone, ecological transition zone, ecological prevention and control zone were 55672.69 km(2), 32662.24 km(2), 23862.84 km(2) and 12021.04 km(2), accounting for 44.82%, 26.29%, 19.21% and 9.68%, respectively. We also extracted 95 ecological corridors (with a total length of 3130.97 km), 49 ecological pinch points (with a total area of 200.33 km(2)) and 30 ecological barrier points (with a total area of 318.30 km(2)), constituting a "points-lines-planes" comprehensive ecological security pattern. This research can provide scientific reference for the protection and restoration of ecological environment and regional sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of landscape pattern in the main river basin of Liao River in China based on ecological network
    Jing, Mengqi
    Song, Fei
    Meng, Kexin
    Su, Fangli
    Wei, Chao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (24) : 65587 - 65601
  • [42] Ecological Security Assessment Based on the "Importance-Sensitivity-Connectivity" Index and Pattern Construction: A Case Study of Xiliu Ditch in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Xu, Xinlei
    Wang, Siyuan
    Yan, Gege
    He, Xinyi
    LAND, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [43] Impact analysis of expressway construction on ecological carrying capacity in the Three-River Headwater Region
    Jia, Xingli
    Zhou, Wuxiao
    Lei, Tian
    Jing, Lizhu
    Shen, Yixin
    JOURNAL OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ENGLISH EDITION, 2020, 7 (05) : 700 - 714
  • [44] Ecological Risk Identification and Ecological Security Pattern Construction of Productive Wetland Landscape
    Chen, Lihua
    Ma, Yuan
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (12) : 4709 - 4731
  • [45] Evolution of the ecological security pattern of the Yellow River Basin based on ecosystem services: a case study of the Shanxi section, China
    Wang, Jinfang
    Lv, Zhihong
    Zhen, Zhilei
    Wu, Qian
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [46] Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert-Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China
    Cheng, Wenhao
    Ma, Caihong
    Li, Tongsheng
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    LAND, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [47] Ecological Carrying Capacity of Tibet China ——Variety of Ecological Footprints from 1978 to 2002
    LIU Xiao-bao
    GAO Ji-xi
    Lori Anna Conzo
    GAO Ming-gang
    HE Ping
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2005, (04) : 647 - 652
  • [48] Optimizing landscape patterns to maximize ecological-production benefits of water-food relationship: Evidence from the West Liaohe River basin, China
    Lyu, Xin
    Li, Xiaobing
    Wang, Kai
    Dang, Dongliang
    Gong, Jirui
    Wang, Hong
    Lou, Anru
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 34 (11) : 3388 - 3405
  • [49] Study on the Construction of the Ecological Security Pattern of the Lancang River Basin (Yunnan Section) Based on InVEST-MSPA-Circuit Theory
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Long
    Song, Yuhong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [50] Research of Ecological Carrying Capacity -Comprehensive Evaluation Model
    Li, Ying
    Guo, Tingting
    Zhou, Jing
    2011 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHALLENGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (CESCE 2011), VOL 11, PT B, 2011, 11 : 864 - 868