Seismic Response and Design of Steel Multitiered Concentrically Braced Frames Not Specifically Detailed for Seismic Resistance

被引:1
作者
Imanpour, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Steel multitiered concentrically braced frames; Low-ductility systems; Moderate seismic regions; Nonlinear analysis; Seismic design; Metal and composite structures; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTIONS; COLUMNS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12182
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel multitiered concentrically braced frames (MT-CBFs) not specifically detailed for seismic resistance with a response modification factor of R=3 are permitted in moderate seismic regions. Past research studies, however, have raised concerns regarding the seismic performance of MT-CBFs and CBFs designed using R=3 provisions, namely the stability of columns in MT-CBFs and connection limit states in R=3 CBFs. This paper examines the seismic response of R=3 MT-CBFs and proposes a design method to improve their seismic performance. A set of 16 prototype R=3 MT-CBFs, ranging from 8 to 20 m tall with two to five tiers and located in a moderate seismic area, was selected and designed in accordance with 2016 US design guidelines. Nonlinear response-history analyses were then performed to examine the seismic response of these frames using fiber-based numerical models. R=3 MT-CBFs designed to 2016 design guidelines are shown to experience premature fracture in brace-to-beam/column connections in a single tier, which imposes high in-plane bending demands on columns and in some cases, leads to column instability or a tier-sway mechanism. New seismic design recommendations, including requirements for intermediate struts, columns, and tier drift, are proposed. The design method aims to prevent column instability or a tier-sway mechanism and protect brace connections from excessive deformation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Comparative Seismic Response Evaluation of Steel Multistory and Multitiered Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames [J].
Agarwal, Aradhana ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (10)
[2]  
Aguero A., 2006, ADV STEEL CONSTR, V2, P242, DOI [10.18057/ijasc.2006.2.3.5, DOI 10.18057/IJASC.2006.2.3.5]
[3]  
AISC, 2016, 30316 AISC ANSI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Standard specification for steel, sheet, carbon, structural, and high-strength, low-alloy, hot-rolled and cold-rolled
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SPEC STRUCT STEEL BU
[7]  
Appel M. E., 2008, Design of low-ductility chevron braced frames for moderate seismic demands
[8]  
ASCE, 2016, Minimum Design loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784414248
[9]   Seismic response of steel multi-tiered eccentrically braced frames [J].
Ashrafi, Abolfazl ;
Imanpour, Ali .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2021, 181 (181)
[10]  
ASTM, 2009, ASTM A36/A36M-19