Two different regimens of outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial

被引:1
作者
Hong, Jesrine [1 ]
Raghavan, Sreella [1 ]
Nordiana, Ayub Siti [1 ]
Saaid, Rahmah [1 ]
Vallikkannu, Narayanan [1 ]
Tan, Peng Chiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jalan Prof Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
amniotomy; cesarean; expectant management; Foley catheter; maternal satisfaction; nulliparous; outpatient labor induction; CESAREAN DELIVERY; UNFAVORABLE CERVIX; RISK; WOMEN; AMNIOTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15199
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate expectant compared to immediate return to hospital upon outpatient Foley catheter expulsion predicated on maternal satisfaction and amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval.Methods: This randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital in Malaysia from September 2020 to February 2022. A total of 330 nulliparous women at term with unripe cervices (Bishop score <= 5), singleton viable fetus in cephalic presentation, reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing and intact membranes who underwent planned outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor (IOL) were included. Women were randomized to expectant or immediate return to hospital if the Foley was spontaneously expelled at home before their scheduled hospital admission the following day. Primary outcomes were amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction on the induction process (assessed by 0-10 visual numerical rating scale [VNRS]).Results: Amniotomy-titrated oxytocin infusion to delivery interval was 8.7 +/- 4.1 versus 8.9 +/- 3.9 h, P = 0.605 (mean difference - 0.228 95% CI: -1.1 to +0.6 h) and maternal satisfaction VNRS score was median (interquartile range) 8 (7-9) versus 8 (7-9), P = 0.782. Early return to hospital rates were 37/165 (22.4%) versus 72/165 (43.6%), RR 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37-0.72), P <= 0.001, Cesarean delivery rates were 80/165 (48.5%) versus 80/165 (48.5%), RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.80-1.25), P = 1.00 and duration of hospital stay was 54.4 +/- 22.9 versus 56.7 +/- 22.8 h, P = 0.364 for the expectant versus immediate return groups respectively.Conclusion: In outpatient Foley catheter IOL, expectant compared to immediate return to hospital following Foley dislodgement results in similarly high maternal satisfaction. The amniotomy-titrated oxytocin to delivery duration is non-inferior with expectant management.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30 mL or 60 mL: A randomized controlled trial
    Sandberg, Evelien M.
    Schepers, Evy M.
    van Sitter, Rosalie L.
    Huisman, Claartje M. A.
    van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 211 : 150 - 155
  • [22] Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study
    Solt, Ido
    Wolf, Maya Frank
    Ben-Haroush, Shani
    Kaminskyi, Svetlana
    Ophir, Ella
    Bornstein, Jacob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (07) : 1034 - 1041
  • [23] Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial
    Sargunam, Patrick Naveen
    Bak, Lindy Li Mei
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Azmi, Mat Adenan Noor
    Zaidi, Syeda Nureena
    Win, Sandar Tin
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [24] A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction
    Moraes Filho, Olimpio B.
    Albuquerque, Rivaldo M.
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (08) : 1045 - 1052
  • [25] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques
    Barrilleaux, PS
    Bofill, JA
    Terrone, DA
    Magann, EF
    May, WL
    Morrison, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1124 - 1129
  • [26] Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method
    Obut, Mehmet
    Balsak, Deniz
    Sarsmaz, Kemal
    Tolunay, Harun E.
    Varli, Erol N.
    Sahin, Dilek
    Yucel, Aykan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 (03) : 496 - 504
  • [27] A double-blinded randomized controlled trial on the effects of increased intravenous hydration in nulliparas undergoing induction of labor
    Duffy, Jennifer Y.
    Wu, Erica
    Fong, Alex
    Garite, Thomas J.
    Shrivastava, Vineet K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02)
  • [28] Early versus delayed amniotomy with immediate oxytocin after Foley catheter cervical ripening in multiparous women with labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
    Jamaluddin, Arifah
    Azhary, Jerilee Mariam Khong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (02) : 661 - 669
  • [29] Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every three hours in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
    Yunesh, Krishnan
    Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad
    Wong, Thai Ying
    Gan, Farah
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (02)
  • [30] Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Huang, Ding
    Liu, Yang
    Qu, Cuicui
    Mo, Huiqin
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Wentao
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Shen, Hong
    Cheng, Weiwei
    Ying, Hao
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (09)