Carbon footprint of industry-sponsored late-stage clinical trials

被引:9
作者
Mackillop, Neil [1 ]
Shah, Jayesh [2 ]
Collins, Michael [2 ]
Costelloe, Thomas [2 ]
Ohman, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca PLC, Late Clin Dev Cardiovasc Renal & Metab, Cambridge, England
[2] Environm Resources Management, London, England
[3] AstraZeneca, Late Clin Dev Cardiovasc Renal & Metab, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
clinical trial; public health; statistics & research methods;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072491
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo quantify the carbon footprint from a sample of pharma industry sponsored phase III trials. To develop an approach that can readily be applied to future trials by AstraZeneca and other trial sponsors. DesignLife cycle assessment including all the sources of carbon emissions associated with a completed, an ongoing and a planned clinical trial. The methodology followed the guidance on appraising the sustainability of Care Pathways, developed by the UK National Health Service in collaboration with parties across the healthcare system. SettingThree multicentre late phase trials. One completed heart failure trial, one ongoing oncology trial and one asthma trial with the addition of devices to be representative of current practice. ParticipantsThe three trials had a total number of 7412 participants. Main outcome measuresTotal carbon emissions from each trial, the drivers of those emissions and the emissions per patient. ResultsThe total carbon footprint for the cardiovascular trial was calculated as 2498 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e), the first 3 years of the oncology trial resulted in 1632 tonnes CO(2)e and the respiratory trial 1437 tonnes CO(2)e. ConclusionsWe have shown that it is feasible to perform a retrospective life cycle assessment to appraise the carbon footprint of large clinical trials and confirmed that phase III trials result in significant emissions. Having identified all the drivers of emissions and their magnitude, we are well placed to develop a plan for achieving net-zero carbon clinical trials. Now it is possible to expand the use of life cycle assessment to planned studies so that scientific aims can be achieved with a minimum of carbon emissions. We encourage other trialists to apply the same methodology as a necessary first step in reducing the carbon footprint of clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A strategy to reduce the carbon footprint of clinical trials Comment
    Adshead, Fiona
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    Aumonier, Simon
    Collins, Michael
    Hood, Kerry
    McNamara, Carolyn
    Moore, Keith
    Smith, Richard
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. LANCET, 2021, 398 (10297) : 281 - 282
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, FOOD WARM WORLD THE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, ISO 14040:2006
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, CLIM AMB ALL RAC ZER
  • [5] AstraZeneca, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR
  • [6] Burnett J, 2007, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V334, P671
  • [7] Industry funding of clinical trials: Benefit or bias?
    Chopra, SS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (01): : 113 - 114
  • [8] ClinicalTrials.gov:, US
  • [9] Accelerating climate action: the role of health professionals
    Dobson, Juliet
    Cook, Sophie
    Frumkin, Howard
    Haines, Andy
    Abbasi, Kamran
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 375
  • [10] EXIOBASE, 2023, US