Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses: Safety and Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Treatments for Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

被引:0
作者
Zulauf-McCurdy, Courtney A. [1 ]
LaCount, Patrick A. [1 ]
Shelton, Christopher R. [2 ]
Morrow, Anne S. [3 ]
Zhao, Xin A. [4 ]
Russell, Douglas [1 ]
Sibley, Margaret H. [1 ,6 ]
Arnold, L. Eugene [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Behrend Coll, State Coll, PA USA
[3] South Florida Integrat Med, Coral Gables, FL USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Nisonger Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Ctr Child Hlth Behav & Dev, M-S Cure 3,POB 5371, Seattle, WA 98145 USA
关键词
complementary and alternative treatments; ADHD; meta-analyses; safety; integrative health; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; ZINC SUPPLEMENTATION; CHILDREN; INTERVENTIONS; ADHD; ADOLESCENTS; SYMPTOMS; MEDICINE; FOOD;
D O I
10.1097/DBP.0000000000001184
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective:Complementary and alternative treatments (CATs) for ADHD have proliferated over the past decade; however, their safety and efficacy remain uncertain. We completed a systematic review and meta-analyses across CAT domains.Methods:Systematic search and data extraction identified randomized controlled trials for pediatric ADHD (ages 3-19 years) that included probably blind ADHD symptom outcome measures. We evaluated basic (RCT of a CAT compared with sham/placebo, attention/active control, treatment as usual, and waitlist control), complementary (RCTs comparing an evidence-based treatment with a CAT and the same evidence-based treatment), and alternative (evidence-based treatment to CAT) efficacy. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted when at least 3 blinded studies were identified for a specific CAT domain.Results:Eighty-seven of 2253 nonduplicate screened manuscripts met inclusion criteria. No study reported significantly greater adverse effects for CATs than controls; naturopathy reported fewer adverse effects than evidence-based treatments but did not demonstrate basic efficacy. In the systematic review of basic efficacy, evidence of effectiveness was mixed but replicated previous evidence for the possible efficacy of cognitive training, neurofeedback, and essential fatty acid supplementation for certain patients. With respect to alternative and complementary efficacy, no CAT outperformed or enhanced evidence-based treatments (stimulant medications and behavioral therapy) when replication was required. Individual meta-analyses indicated that cognitive training was the only CAT that demonstrated overall basic efficacy (SMD = 0.216; p = 0.032).Conclusion:Clinicians may cautiously recommend (but monitor) cognitive training when evidence-based treatments are not feasible or effective for a patient. Additional studies are needed to further understand the potential of CAT domains.
引用
收藏
页码:e322 / e332
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Achenbach T. M., 2000, CHILD BEHAV CHECKLIS
  • [2] Zinc sulfate as an adjunct to methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: A double blind and randomized trial [ISRCTN64132371]
    Akhondzadeh, Shahin
    Mohammadi, Mohammad-Reza
    Khademi, Mojgan
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 4 (1)
  • [3] Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Autism: An Evidence-Based Approach to Negotiating Safe and Efficacious Interventions with Families
    Akins, R. Scott
    Angkustsiri, Kathy
    Hansen, Robin L.
    [J]. NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2010, 7 (03) : 307 - 319
  • [4] Arnold L., 2011, TREATING ATTENTION D, p14.1
  • [5] Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-up
    Arnold, L. Eugene
    Arns, Martijn
    Barterian, Justin
    Bergman, Rachel
    Black, Sarah
    deBeus, Roger
    Higgins, Teryll
    Hollway, Jill A.
    Kerson, Cynthia
    Lightstone, Howard
    McBurnett, Keith
    Monastra, Vincent
    Buchan-Page, Kristin
    Pan, Xueliang
    Rice, Robert
    Roley-Roberts, Michelle E.
    Schrader, Constance
    Tan, Yubo
    Williams, Craig E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (07) : 841 - 855
  • [6] EEG Neurofeedback for ADHD: Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Randomized Pilot Feasibility Trial
    Arnold, L. Eugene
    Lofthouse, Nicholas
    Hersch, Sarah
    Pan, Xueliang
    Hurt, Elizabeth
    Bates, Bethany
    Kassouf, Kathleen
    Moone, Stacey
    Grantier, Cara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2013, 17 (05) : 410 - 419
  • [7] Zinc for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Pilot Trial Alone and Combined with Amphetamine
    Arnold, L. Eugene
    DiSilvestro, Robert A.
    Bozzolo, Dawn
    Bozzolo, Hernan
    Crowl, Lindsay
    Fernandez, Soledad
    Ramadan, Yaser
    Thompson, Susan
    Mo, Xiaokui
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Joseph, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [8] Zinc in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Arnold, LE
    DiSilvestro, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) : 619 - 627
  • [9] The effects of a double blind, placebo controlled, artificial food colourings and benzoate preservative challenge on hyperactivity in a general population sample of preschool children
    Bateman, B
    Warner, JO
    Hutchinson, E
    Dean, T
    Rowlandson, P
    Gant, C
    Grundy, J
    Fitzgerald, C
    Stevenson, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2004, 89 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [10] Attitudes toward attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment: Parents' and children's perspectives
    Berger, Itai
    Dor, Talia
    Nevo, Yoram
    Goldzweig, Gil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2008, 23 (09) : 1036 - 1042