Legally Recognizing Reproductive Coercion while Questioning Sexual Violence Exceptionalism

被引:1
作者
Stoever, Jane [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Law, UCI, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] UCI, Law Domest Violence Clini, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] UCI, Initiat End Family Violence, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Reproductive Coercion; Intimate Partner Violence; Abortion Bans; Rape Exceptions; Reproductive Justice; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; WOMEN; RAPE;
D O I
10.1017/jme.2023.104
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While sexual violence should not be the prerequisite for legal abortion, expanding definitions of abuse to include reproductive coercion can open avenues of access to abortion following the Dobbs decision. Understanding the increased danger and compounding challenges of intimate partner violence can inform legislative initiatives, healthcare responses, and movements for reproductive justice.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 564
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Abrams Abigail, 2022, Time
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2013, COMMITTEE OPINION, P554
  • [3] [Anonymous], dynamics of nature, extent, classification, DOI 10.1037/e300342003-001
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1905, Roller v. Roller
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, DOBBS V JACKSON WOME
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1976, Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2023, After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1992, PLANNED PARENTHOOD V
  • [9] Bennice Jennifer A, 2003, Trauma Violence Abuse, V4, P228, DOI 10.1177/1524838003004003003
  • [10] Bergen R.K., 2006, Marital Rape: New Research and Directions, P6