Delegation of purchasing tasks to AI: The role of perceived choice and decision autonomy

被引:9
作者
Husairi, Mariyani Ahmad [1 ]
Rossi, Patricia [2 ]
机构
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Rouen Campus,1 Rue Marechal Juin, F-76130 Mont St Aignan, France
[2] Univ Cote dAzur, SKEMA Business Sch, Ave Willy Brandt, F-59777 Lille, France
关键词
Autonomy; Choice; Decision; Artificial intelligence; AI; AI adoption; AI aversion; Consumer decision-making process; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; RECOMMENDATION AGENTS; IDENTITY SALIENCE; CONSUMER; IMPACT; CONSUMPTION; COMPLEXITY; BEHAVIOR; VARIETY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2023.114166
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Although artificial intelligence (AI) outperforms humans in many tasks, research suggests some consumers are still averse to having AI perform tasks on their behalf. Informed by the literature of customer decision-making process, we propose and show that consumer autonomy is a significant predictor of customers' decision to adopt AI in the purchasing context. Across three experiments, we found that the delegation of purchasing tasks to AI, which restricts choice and decision dimensions of consumers' perceived autonomy, reduces the likelihood of AI adoption. Our results show that the effects of choice and decision autonomy on AI adoption holds even when product choice evaluation is complex. We also found that identity-relevant consumption moderates this relationship, such that it interacts with choice and decision autonomy. Specifically, despite lacking choice and decision autonomy, those who identify strongly with a given activity are more likely to use an AI-enabled app to purchase the product needed to perform this activity. With these insights into when and why consumers are likely to use AI-enabled technology, firms might effectively increase its adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Navigating autonomy and control in human-AI delegation: User responses to technology- versus user-invoked task allocation
    Adam, Martin
    Diebel, Christopher
    Goutier, Marc
    Benlian, Alexander
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2024, 180
  • [2] Suspicious of AI? Perceived autonomy and interdependence predict AI-related conspiracy beliefs
    Zhao, Qi
    van Prooijen, Jan-Willem
    Jiang, Xinying
    Spadaro, Giuliana
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 64 (02)
  • [3] Exploring the role of AI algorithmic agents: The impact of algorithmic decision autonomy on consumer purchase decisions
    Fan, Yuejiao
    Liu, Xianggang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [4] The influence of AI recommendation on consumer switching behavior: the mediating effect of perceived autonomy
    Ou, Yilin
    Li, Hongbo
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, : 9706 - 9718
  • [5] The Role of Consumer Autonomy in Developing Sustainable AI: A Conceptual Framework
    Bjorlo, Lena
    Moen, Oystein
    Pasquine, Mark
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [6] Choice, Uncertainty, and Decision Superiority: Is Less AI-Enabled Decision Support More?
    Ward, Paul
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (04) : 781 - 791
  • [7] DELEGA(I)TING HEALTHCARE TASKS - A Qualitative Analysis of AI Delegation Factors for Healthcare Professionals
    Nserat, Joseph
    Braun, Marvin
    Kegel, Felix
    Kolbe, Lutz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 57TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, : 3547 - 3556
  • [8] Under Which Conditions Are Humans Motivated to Delegate Tasks to AI? A Taxonomy on the Human Emotional State Driving the Motivation for AI Delegation
    Bouwer, Anna
    MARKETING AND SMART TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1, 2022, 279 : 37 - 53
  • [9] 'Smart ' Choice? Evaluating AI-Based mobile decision bots for in-store decision-making
    Chattaraman, Veena
    Kwon, Wi-Suk
    Ross, Kassandra
    Sung, Jihyun
    Alikhademi, Kiana
    Richardson, Brianna
    Gilbert, Juan E.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 183
  • [10] Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy
    Moller, Arlen C.
    Deci, Edward L.
    Ryan, Richard M.
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (08) : 1024 - 1036