High Complication Rate After Early Ileostomy Closure: Early Termination of the Short Versus Long Interval to Loop Ileostomy Reversal After Pouch Surgery Randomized Trial

被引:9
|
作者
Vogel, Jon D. [1 ,9 ]
Fleshner, Phillip R. [2 ]
Holubar, Stefan D. [3 ]
Poylin, Vitaliy Y. [4 ]
Regenbogen, Scott E. [5 ]
Chapman, Brandon C. [1 ]
Messaris, Evangelos [6 ]
Mutch, Matthew G. [7 ]
Hyman, Neil H. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Colorectal Surg Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Colorectal Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
[7] Washington Univ, Dept Surg, St Louis, MI USA
[8] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Dept Surg, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Diverting loop ileostomy; IPAA; Ulcerative colitis; ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; DEFUNCTIONING ILEOSTOMY; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002427
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: In patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo IPAA, a diverting ileostomy is used to diminish the severity of anastomotic complications. Typically, the ileostomy is closed after an interval of 2 to 4 months. The safety of earlier closure of the ileostomy after pouch surgery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes in patients randomly assigned to early (7-12 days) or late (>= 8 weeks) ileostomy closure after ileal pouch construction. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective randomized trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at colorectal surgical units at select United States hospitals. PATIENTS: Adults with ulcerative colitis who underwent 2- or 3-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes included Comprehensive Complication Index at 30 days after ileostomy closure. The secondary outcomes included complications, severe complications, reoperations, and readmissions within 30 days of ileostomy closure. RESULTS: The trial was stopped after interim analysis because of a high rate of complications after early ileostomy closure. Among 36 patients analyzed, 1 patient (3%) had unplanned proctectomy with end-ileostomy. Of the remaining 35 patients, 28 patients (80%) were clinically eligible for early closure and underwent radiologic assessment. There were 3 radiologic failures. Of the 25 remaining patients, 22 patients (88%) were randomly assigned to early closure (n = 10) or late closure (n = 12), and 3 patients were excluded. Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 14.8 (0-54) and 0 (0-23) after early and late closure (p = 0.02). One or more complications occurred in 7 patients (70%) after early closure and in 2 patients (17%) after late closure (p = 0.01), and complications were severe in 3 patients (30%) after early closure and 0 patients after late closure (p = 0.04). Reoperation was required in 1 patient (10%) and 0 patients (p = 0.26) after early closure and readmission was required in 7 patients (70%) and 1 patient (8%) after late closure (p = 0.003). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by early study closure and selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Early closure of a diverting ileostomy in patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent IPAA is associated with an unacceptably high rate of complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww. com/DCR/C68.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Early versus late reversal of diverting loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Ellebaek, Mark Bremholm
    Perdawood, Sharaf Karim
    Steenstrup, Signe
    Khalaf, Sardar
    Kundal, Jette
    Moller, Soeren
    Bang, Jacob Christian
    Stovring, Jens
    Qvist, Niels
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] Early versus standard closure of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial
    Bausys, Augustinas
    Kuliavas, Justas
    Dulskas, Audrius
    Kryzauskas, Marius
    Pauza, Kastytis
    Kilius, Alfredas
    Rudinskaite, Giedre
    Sangaila, Egidijus
    Bausys, Rimantas
    Stratilatovas, Eugenijus
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 120 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [3] Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis
    Clancy, C.
    Connelly, T. M.
    Jia, X.
    Lipman, J.
    Lightner, A. L.
    Hull, T.
    Steele, S. R.
    Holubar, S. D.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (12) : 1257 - 1263
  • [4] Early postoperative outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy closure surgery following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery
    Yellinek, Shlomo
    Krizzuk, Dimitri
    Gilshtein, Hayim
    Djadou, Teresa Moreno
    de Sousa, Cesar Augusto Barros
    Qureshi, Sana
    Wexner, Steven D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (06): : 2509 - 2514
  • [5] Early versus late closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Li
    Chen, Xinling
    Liao, Chen
    Wu, Qian
    Luo, Hongliang
    Yi, Fengming
    Wei, Yiping
    Zhang, Wenxiong
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (04) : 463 - 471
  • [6] Early postoperative outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy closure surgery following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery
    Shlomo Yellinek
    Dimitri Krizzuk
    Hayim Gilshtein
    Teresa Moreno-Djadou
    Cesar Augusto Barros de Sousa
    Sana Qureshi
    Steven D. Wexner
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 2509 - 2514
  • [7] Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study
    Memon, S.
    Heriot, A. G.
    Atkin, C. E.
    Lynch, A. C.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 16 (04) : 285 - 290
  • [8] Early ileostomy reversal after minimally invasive surgery and ERAS program for mid and low rectal cancer
    Pedrazzani, Corrado
    Secci, Federica
    Fernandes, Eduardo
    Jelovskijs, Ivans
    Turri, Giulia
    Conti, Cristian
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (03) : 485 - 492
  • [9] Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Kim, Sohyun
    Jung, Sang Hun
    Kim, Jae Hwang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (05) : 811 - 819
  • [10] Outcomes of Early Versus Standard Closure of Diverting Ileostomy After Proctectomy: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Emile, Sameh Hany
    Horesh, Nir
    Garoufalia, Zoe
    Gefen, Rachel
    Ray-Offor, Emeka
    Wexner, Steven D.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2024, 279 (04) : 613 - 619