Identifying the role of green financial development played in carbon intensity: Evidence from China

被引:42
作者
Huang, Junbing [1 ]
An, Lufeng [1 ]
Peng, Weihui [2 ]
Guo, Lili [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Green financial development; Carbon intensity; Green transition; Entropy method; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY EVIDENCE; EMISSION INTENSITY; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; AIR-POLLUTION; URBANIZATION; INVESTMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing studies have explored the effect of green finance on carbon emissions. However, few studies have distinguished green financial efficiency from scale, which are crucial aspects for financial development. We add these dimensions to construct a synthetic index of green financial development and apply the entropy method to measure it based on China's provincial dataset from 2000 to 2019 through a series of econometric analyses. Green technology innovation, energy mix optimisation, and industrial structure upgrades are selected as the influencing channels to demonstrate the effect of green financial development on carbon intensity. The results show that in general, green financial development significantly decreases carbon intensity. All components of green finance have a positive influence in decreasing carbon intensity, except for green investment tools. Green financial efficiency has been a more important driver of carbon intensity reduction than the green financial scale, specifically for the eastern regions after the 12th Five Year Plan. The two-step analysis of the influencing mechanisms reveals that all three green transition channels are essential for decreasing the carbon intensity. These results imply more green finance policies on enhancing synergetic effect, optimising investment structure and increasing allocation efficiency are called in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[11]  
CPGC (Central People's Government of China), 2011, CHIN POL ACT CLIM CH
[12]  
Crenshaw E., 1996, Social structure and global climate change: Sociological propositions concerning the greenhouse effect, V29, P341, DOI [10.1080/00380237.1996.10570650, DOI 10.1080/00380237.1996.10570650]
[13]   Pollution and capital markets in developing countries [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Laplante, B ;
Mamingi, N .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 42 (03) :310-335
[14]   Drivers of carbon emission intensity change in China [J].
Dong, Feng ;
Yu, Bolin ;
Hadachin, Tergel ;
Dai, Yuanju ;
Wang, Ying ;
Zhang, Shengnan ;
Long, Ruyin .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 129 :187-201
[15]   Carbon emissions determinants and forecasting: Evidence from G6 countries [J].
Duc Khuong Nguyen ;
Toan Luu Duc Huynh ;
Nasir, Muhammad Ali .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 285
[16]  
Ehlers T., 2020, BIS Quarterly Review
[17]   Foreign direct investment in services and manufacturing productivity: Evidence for Chile [J].
Fernandes, Ana M. ;
Paunov, Caroline .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :305-321
[18]  
Gouldson A., 1997, GREENING MILLENNIUM
[19]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
GROSSMAN, GM ;
KRUEGER, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (02) :353-377
[20]  
Haas D.R., 2019, FINANCE CARBON EMISS