The results of clinician-focused implementation strategies on uptake and outcomes of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in general mental health care

被引:9
作者
van Sonsbeek, Maartje A. M. S. [1 ]
Hutschemaekers, Giel J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veerman, Jan W. [3 ]
Vermulst, Ad [4 ]
Tiemens, Bea G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pro Persona, Pro Persona Res, Postbus 27, NL-6870 AA Renkum, Netherlands
[2] Indigo Serv Org BV, Indigo Gelderland, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] GGZ Mental Hlth Care Oost Brabant, Boekelo, Netherlands
关键词
Implementation; Hybrid design; Clinician-focused; Measurement-based care; General mental health care; MEASUREMENT FEEDBACK-SYSTEM; QUALITY; IMPROVEMENT; PROGRESS; INFORMATION; THERAPISTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09343-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMeasurement-Based Care (MBC) is the routine administration of measures, clinicians' review of the feedback and discussion of the feedback with their clients, and collaborative evaluation of the treatment plan. Although MBC is a promising way to improve outcomes in clinical practice, the implementation of MBC faces many barriers, and its uptake by clinicians is low. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether implementation strategies that were developed with clinicians and aimed at clinicians had an effect on (a) clinicians' uptake of MBC and (b) clients' outcomes of MBC. MethodsWe used an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design based on Grol and Wensing's implementation framework to assess the impact of clinician-focused implementation strategies on both clinicians' uptake of MBC and outcomes obtained with MBC for clients in general mental health care. We hereby focused on the first and second parts of MBC, i.e., the administration of measures and use of feedback. Primary outcome measures were questionnaire completion rate and discussion of the feedback with clients. Secondary outcomes were treatment outcome, treatment length, and satisfaction with treatment. ResultsThere was a significant effect of the MBC implementation strategies on questionnaire completion rate (one part of clinicians' uptake), but no significant effect on the amount of discussion of the feedback (the other part of clinicians' uptake). Neither was there a significant effect on clients' outcomes (treatment outcome, treatment length, and satisfaction with treatment). Due to various study limitations, the results should be viewed as exploratory. ConclusionsEstablishing and sustaining MBC in real-world general mental health care is complex. This study helps to disentangle the effects of MBC implementation strategies on differential clinician uptake, but the effects of MBC implementation strategies on client outcomes need further examination.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting [J].
Amble, Ingunn ;
Gude, Tore ;
Stubdal, Sven ;
Andersen, Bror Just ;
Wampold, Bruce E. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (06) :669-677
[3]  
Angus D, 2006, IMPLEMENT SCI, V1, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IBM SPSS STAT WINDOW
[5]  
Bandura A., 1977, COGNITIVE THER RES, V1, P287, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01663995, 10.1007/bf01663995]
[6]  
Barkham M., 2021, Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change
[7]   Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites [J].
Bickman, Leonard ;
Douglas, Susan R. ;
De Andrade, Ana Regina Vides ;
Tomlinson, Michele ;
Gleacher, Alissa ;
Olin, Serene ;
Hoagwood, Kimberly .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 43 (03) :410-425
[8]   Monitoring processes and outcomes in routine clinical practice: A promising approach to plugging the holes of the practice-based evidence colander [J].
Boswell, James F. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2020, 30 (07) :829-842
[9]   Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions [J].
Boswell, James F. ;
Kraus, David R. ;
Miller, Scott D. ;
Lambert, Michael J. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (01) :6-19
[10]   The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research [J].
Boyce, Maria B. ;
Browne, John P. ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (06) :508-518