Evaluating wind profiles in a numerical weather prediction model with Doppler lidar

被引:5
作者
Pentikainen, Pyry [1 ]
O'Connor, Ewan J. [2 ,3 ]
Ortiz-Amezcua, Pablo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res Phys, Fac Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading, England
[4] Univ Warsaw, Inst Geophys, Fac Phys, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Andalusian Inst Earth Syst Res, Granada, Spain
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
LOW-LEVEL JETS; BOUNDARY-LAYER; FORECAST VERIFICATION; AIR-POLLUTION; RADAR; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; ERRORS;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We use Doppler lidar wind profiles from six locations around the globe to evaluate the wind profile forecasts in the boundary layer generated by the operational global Integrated Forecast System (IFS) from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The six locations selected cover a variety of surfaces with different characteristics (rural, marine, mountainous urban, and coastal urban).We first validated the Doppler lidar observations at four locations by comparison with co-located radiosonde profiles to ensure that the Doppler lidar observations were of sufficient quality. The two observation types agree well, with the mean absolute error (MAE) in wind speed almost always less than 1 m s(-1). Large deviations in the wind direction were usually only seen for low wind speeds and are due to the wind direction uncertainty increasing rapidly as the wind speed tends to zero.Time-height composites of the wind evaluation with 1 h resolution were generated, and evaluation of the model winds showed that the IFS model performs best over marine and coastal locations, where the mean absolute wind vector error was usually less than 3 m s(-1) at all heights within the boundary layer. Larger errors were seen in locations where the surface was more complex, especially in the wind direction. For example, in Granada, which is near a high mountain range, the IFS model failed to capture a commonly occurring mountain breeze, which is highly dependent on the sub-grid-size terrain features that are not resolved by the model. The uncertainty in the wind forecasts increased with forecast lead time, but no increase in the bias was seen.At one location, we conditionally performed the wind evaluation based on the presence or absence of a low-level jet diagnosed from the Doppler lidar observations. The model was able to reproduce the presence of the low-level jet, but the wind speed maximum was about 2 m s(-1) lower than observed. This is attributed to the effective vertical resolution of the model being too coarse to create the strong gradients in wind speed observed.Our results show that Doppler lidar is a suitable instrument for evaluating the boundary layer wind profiles in atmospheric models.
引用
收藏
页码:2077 / 2094
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Comparison of 10-m wind forecasts from a regional area model and QuikSCAT Scatterometer wind observations over the Mediterranean Sea
    Accadia, Christophe
    Zecchetto, Stefano
    Lavagnini, Alfredo
    Speranza, Antonio
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2007, 135 (05) : 1945 - 1960
  • [2] Andersson E., 2017, ECMWF NEWSLETTER, V153, P37, DOI [10.21957/9fxea2, DOI 10.21957/9FXEA2]
  • [3] [Anonymous], ATMOSPHERIC RAD MEAS
  • [4] Model Wind Field Forecast Verification Using Multiple-Doppler Syntheses from a National Radar Network
    Beck, Jeffrey
    Nuret, Mathieu
    Bousquet, Olivier
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2014, 29 (02) : 331 - 348
  • [5] Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain
    Bingoel, Ferhat
    Mann, Jakob
    Foussekis, Dimitri
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2009, 18 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [6] Bormann N, 2003, MON WEATHER REV, V131, P706, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0706:TSSOOE>2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Forecast verification: current status and future directions
    Casati, B.
    Wilson, L. J.
    Stephenson, D. B.
    Nurmi, P.
    Ghelli, A.
    Pocernich, M.
    Damrath, U.
    Ebert, E. E.
    Brown, B. G.
    Mason, S.
    [J]. METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 15 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [9] Pannonian Basin Nocturnal Boundary Layer and Fog Formation: Role of Topography
    Cuxart, Joan
    Telisman Prtenjak, Maja
    Matjacic, Blazenka
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (06)
  • [10] The WMO Challenge to Develop and Demonstrate the Best New User-Oriented Forecast Verification Metric
    Ebert, Elizabeth
    Brown, Barbara
    Goeber, Martin
    Haiden, Thomas
    Mittermaier, Marion
    Nurmi, Pertti
    Wilson, Laurie
    Jackson, Sarah
    Johnston, Peter
    Schuster, Dieter
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2018, 27 (06) : 435 - 440