Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Li, Xiaoke [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Lei [1 ]
Li, Dijun [1 ]
Fan, Zijuan [3 ]
Liu, Haifeng [1 ]
Wang, Guishan [4 ]
Jiu, Jingwei [1 ]
Yang, Ziquan [1 ]
Li, Jiao Jiao [5 ]
Wang, Bin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Shanxi Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Stat, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[4] Shanxi Med Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Sch Biomed Engn, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; ACL; ACL tear; Failure; Revision; Meta-analysis; PRIMARY ACL RECONSTRUCTION; HAMSTRING TENDON; REVISION RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL MALPOSITION; DANISH REGISTRY; RISK-FACTORS; AUTOGRAFT; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; 5-YEAR;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-023-05687-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe reason for graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial. Controversies remain regarding the predominant factor and incidence of failure aetiology in the literature. This review aimed to provide a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the relative proportion of various failure modes among patients with ACLR failure.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were searched for literature on ACLR failure or revision from 1975 to 2021. Data related to causes for ACLR surgical failure were extracted, and a random effects model was used to pool the results, which incorporates potential heterogeneity. Failure modes were compared between different populations, research methods, graft types, femoral portal techniques, and fixation methods by subgroup analysis or linear regression. Funnel plots were used to identify publication bias and small-study effects.ResultsA total of 39 studies were analyzed, including 33 cohort studies and six registry-based studies reporting 6578 failures. The results showed that among patients with ACLR failure or revision, traumatic reinjury was the most common failure mode with a rate of 40% (95% CI: 35-44%), followed by technical error (34%, 95% CI: 28-42%) and biological failure (11%, 95% CI: 7-15%). Femoral tunnel malposition was the most common cause of the technical error (29%, 95% CI: 18-41%), with more than two times higher occurrence than tibial tunnel malposition (11%, 95% CI: 6-16%). Traumatic reinjury was the most common factor for ACLR failure in European populations and in recent studies, while technical errors were more common in Asian populations, earlier studies, and surgery performed using the transtibial (TT) portal technique. Biological factors were more likely to result in ACLR failure in hamstring (HT) autografts compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.ConclusionTrauma is the most important factor leading to surgical failure or revision following ACLR. Technical error is also an important contributing factor, with femoral tunnel malposition being the leading cause of error resulting in failure.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 734
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   The long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who suffer recurrent injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament after reconstruction [J].
Ahmed, I. ;
Salmon, L. ;
Roe, J. ;
Pinczewski, L. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (03) :337-343
[2]   Comparison of revision surgery with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and outcome of revision surgery between different graft materials [J].
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Yong Seuk ;
Ha, Hae Chan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (10) :1889-1895
[3]   Generalised ligamentous laxity and revision ACL surgery: Is there a relation? [J].
Akhtar, M. Adeel ;
Bhattacharya, R. ;
Keating, J. F. .
KNEE, 2016, 23 (06) :1148-1153
[4]   THE PHENOMENON OF LIGAMENTIZATION - ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH AUTOGENOUS PATELLAR TENDON [J].
AMIEL, D ;
KLEINER, JB ;
ROUX, RD ;
HARWOOD, FL ;
AKESON, WH .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1986, 4 (02) :162-172
[5]   Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery [J].
Anand, Bobby S. ;
Feller, Julian A. ;
Richmond, Anneka K. ;
Webster, Kate E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (03) :580-584
[6]  
Ao Ying-fang, 2007, Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, V45, P86
[7]   Meta-analysis of prevalence [J].
Barendregt, Jan J. ;
Doi, Suhail A. ;
Lee, Yong Yi ;
Norman, Rosana E. ;
Vos, Theo .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 67 (11) :974-978
[8]   Revision ACL reconstruction with autograft: long-term functional outcomes and influencing factors [J].
Boyle, Connor ;
Pagoti, Ravikanth ;
Eng, Khemerin Hun ;
McMahon, Samuel E. ;
Nicholas, Richard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) :157-161
[10]   Young age, female gender, Caucasian race, and workers' compensation claim are risk factors for reoperation following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction [J].
Capogna, Brian M. ;
Mahure, Siddharth A. ;
Mollon, Brent ;
Duenes, Matthew L. ;
Rokito, Andrew S. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (07) :2213-2223