How do formalization, centralization and integration impact dynamic knowledge-based capability?

被引:11
作者
Dominguez Gonzalez, Rodrigo Valio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Appl Sci, Limeira, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Knowledge-based dynamic capability; Organizational structure; Absorptive capacity; Transformative capacity; Manufacturing companies; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL-STRUCTURE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; AMBIDEXTERITY; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2022.2060811
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Dynamic capability is a fundamental concept for firms to achieve competitive advantage. In the past two decades, researcher have studied the impact of dynamic capability on the business, financial, and innovative performance of organizations; however, it is clear that the results achieved by some companies are superior in terms of the development and application of dynamic capability. This difference in terms of the results achieved can be explained by factors related to the organizational structure and, therefore, this research analyses the impacts of the organizational structure on knowledge-based dynamic capability. Partial Least Squares (PLS) was applied to a sample of 192 Brazilian manufacturing companies to analyze our theoretical premises. Our research contributes to the literature by showing how the components of the organizational structure (formalization, centralization, and integration) affect the two elements of knowledge-based dynamic capability (knowledge absorptive and transformative capacity). Previous studies indicate that less mechanical structures, that is, structures with lower levels of centralization and formalization, are favorable for the development of dynamic capability. In a different way, our results indicate that formalization and centralization act differently in relation to the absorptive capacity transformative capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 439
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]   Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework [J].
Mihalache, Oli R. ;
Jansen, Justin J. P. ;
Van den Bosch, Frans A. J. ;
Volberda, Henk W. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (02) :128-148
[52]   How do organizational structures impact operational safety? Part 1-Understanding the dangers of decentralization [J].
Monteiro, Gilsa Pacheco ;
Hopkins, Andrew ;
Frutuoso e Melo, Paulo Fernando .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 123
[53]   Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems [J].
Pandza, Krsto ;
Holt, Robin .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (04) :347-365
[54]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[55]  
Robbins S.P., 1987, ORG THEORY STRUCTURE
[56]   THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM [J].
Schilke, Oliver .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (02) :179-203
[57]   Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence [J].
Szymanski, David M. ;
Kroff, Michael W. ;
Troy, Lisa C. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (01) :35-52
[58]   Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility [J].
Teece, David ;
Peteraf, Margaret ;
Leih, Sohvi .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 58 (04) :13-35
[59]   Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance [J].
Teece, David J. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (13) :1319-1350
[60]  
Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO