How do formalization, centralization and integration impact dynamic knowledge-based capability?

被引:11
作者
Dominguez Gonzalez, Rodrigo Valio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Appl Sci, Limeira, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Knowledge-based dynamic capability; Organizational structure; Absorptive capacity; Transformative capacity; Manufacturing companies; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL-STRUCTURE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; AMBIDEXTERITY; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2022.2060811
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Dynamic capability is a fundamental concept for firms to achieve competitive advantage. In the past two decades, researcher have studied the impact of dynamic capability on the business, financial, and innovative performance of organizations; however, it is clear that the results achieved by some companies are superior in terms of the development and application of dynamic capability. This difference in terms of the results achieved can be explained by factors related to the organizational structure and, therefore, this research analyses the impacts of the organizational structure on knowledge-based dynamic capability. Partial Least Squares (PLS) was applied to a sample of 192 Brazilian manufacturing companies to analyze our theoretical premises. Our research contributes to the literature by showing how the components of the organizational structure (formalization, centralization, and integration) affect the two elements of knowledge-based dynamic capability (knowledge absorptive and transformative capacity). Previous studies indicate that less mechanical structures, that is, structures with lower levels of centralization and formalization, are favorable for the development of dynamic capability. In a different way, our results indicate that formalization and centralization act differently in relation to the absorptive capacity transformative capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 439
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Exploring the relationship between organizational structure and knowledge retention: a study of the Indian infrastructure consulting sector [J].
Acharya, Abhilash ;
Mishra, Bijaya .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (04) :961-985
[2]   Improving team innovation performance: Role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities [J].
Ali, Ahsan ;
Bahadur, Waseem ;
Wang, Nan ;
Luqman, Adeel ;
Khan, Ali Nawaz .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 61
[3]   Exploring the knowledge-focused role of interdependent members on team creative performance [J].
Ali, Ahsan ;
Wang, Hongwei ;
Khan, Ali Nawaz ;
Pitafi, Abdul Hameed ;
Amin, Muhammad Waqas .
ASIAN BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 18 (02) :98-121
[4]   The effect of organizational structure on absorptive capacity in single and dual learning modes [J].
Ali, Murad ;
Ali, Imran ;
Al-Maimani, Khalid A. ;
Park, Kichan .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2018, 3 (03) :108-114
[5]   Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support [J].
Andrews, MC ;
Kacmar, KM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 (04) :347-366
[6]   Measuring the dimensions of quality in service innovation: A dynamic capability and organisational competency perspective [J].
Babaei, Mohsen ;
Aghdassi, Mohammad .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 33 (3-4) :434-466
[7]   Complementary effect of entrepreneurial and market orientations on export new product success under differing levels of competitive intensity and financial capital [J].
Boso, Nathaniel ;
Cadogan, John W. ;
Story, Vicky M. .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2012, 21 (04) :667-681
[8]   The role of strategic purchasing in dynamic capability development and deployment: A contingency perspective [J].
Brandon-Jones, Alistair ;
Knoppen, Desiree .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (02) :446-473
[9]   Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation [J].
Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araujo ;
Lettl, Christopher ;
Ulhoi, John Parm .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :269-284
[10]  
Burns T., 1961, The Management of Innovation